Started By
Message
1
Posted on 10/27/15 at 1:10 pm to mizslu314
quote:
WE GOING 7-5 MOFOOOOOS
Sadly, I'd be pumped about 7-5 right about now.
Posted on 10/27/15 at 5:36 pm to JesusQuintana
quote:
Lock had his chance to put a lockdown on the position and couldn't do it, but I still think the best thing moving forward is committing to the future
The ONLY reason I would accept Mauk back is so he can get the shite beat out of him this year instead of Lock.
And I honestly don't want him anywhere near the program next year.
If the OLine is still shite in 2016 let Zanders run for his life.
Posted on 10/27/15 at 5:39 pm to MizzouPhoto
quote:
Hey, wouldn't Missy look good strutting her stuff on South Beach?
She's a little too beefy for SB. A sweater girl all the way.
Posted on 10/27/15 at 5:56 pm to Mizz-SEC
Well I had accepted losing the rest of our games in exchange for getting Lock experience. I know some are up in arms over his play, but he's a freshman and his performance to date isn't too unexpected. Personally, I hope that they keep on track with Lock. The experience is invaluable for next year.
Having said that, I see a switch back to Mauk to try to save a shot at some shitty bowl. I get that train of thought too but I'm all for sacrificing this year for next. But that means shite canning the seniors on the line other than Boehm and either McGovern at guard or not at all. Develop the young linemen too.
Having said that, I see a switch back to Mauk to try to save a shot at some shitty bowl. I get that train of thought too but I'm all for sacrificing this year for next. But that means shite canning the seniors on the line other than Boehm and either McGovern at guard or not at all. Develop the young linemen too.
Posted on 10/27/15 at 6:11 pm to reedus23
Agreed. What I really-really don't want is for Mauk to come back for 2016 and frick another season for Lock.
Honestly, I'm at a loss. I can't believe (assuming the rumors are true) that HCGP would welcome back a coker under any circumstance, let alone re-installing him as the starting quarterback. It would go against everything GP has tried to portray his program as representing.
I with you on shitcanning the underachievers on the OL and giving younger linemen a shot.
Posted on 10/27/15 at 11:19 pm to reedus23
quote:
McGovern at guard or not at all.
Sorry but that is bullshite, the guy has been a good player for us and has been decent at Tackle. It is not his fault they moved him outside either.
Posted on 10/28/15 at 2:05 am to Tackle74
Problem is this team doesn't have a OT that can play. Chapell and Crawford have both been underwhelming, obviously Cuellar is in the dog house.
Posted on 10/28/15 at 9:03 am to Tackle74
I don't disagree about McGovern. And I appreciate that he's done his best despite getting moved out of position. My point was more directed at the coaches for eliminating a position of strength. Its just stupid that they haven't moved him back inside with all of our struggles.
Posted on 10/28/15 at 9:27 am to Wtodd
quote:
Since the drug rumors probably aren't true,
Wait. What? Is this the latest narrative? Why do you think it's not coke now? All I've heard from the very beginning is that it is well known that Mauk likes coke a little too much for his own good (and worse).
So are we now saying that is all bullshite, or that he likes coke but that isn't the reason for the suspension?
Posted on 10/28/15 at 9:34 am to Aux Arc
A 4 game suspension for drug related issues sounds about right.
Posted on 10/28/15 at 9:43 am to JesusQuintana
I don't believe the rumors he was dealing drugs. But I think he got caught by someone he shouldn't have with drugs and since this was his first offence, he was suspended. 2nd offence is a dismissal.
Posted on 10/28/15 at 9:47 am to JesusQuintana
I'm not sure if you are being sarcastic. I thought a one game suspension for smoking weed was the standard. Not sure if coke is viewed differently. Cuellar just got one game, right? I assumed that Mauk's situation was a little different in that maybe he was viewed as being the bad influence, even the guy who knows the guy, as some have suggested.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News