Started By
Message
0
Posted on 2/3/13 at 6:00 pm to URHatinIt
I am so confused why we have problems with getting DL men. That position has more Mizzou Alumni in the NFL right now than any other position. In fact our Defense has more players in the NFL than Offense!!
Posted on 2/3/13 at 6:43 pm to outlawjoseywales
Shindelar to tulsa
Posted on 2/3/13 at 7:36 pm to URHatinIt
WTF? Do we now need Johnson? I'm so confused!
Posted on 2/3/13 at 7:40 pm to semotruman
Yes, yes we do 
Posted on 2/3/13 at 7:40 pm to semotruman
I'll be honest, I'm getting to the point that I think even if we get EZE, this recruiting class as a whole is a...well time will tell.
ETA - And that's not a reflection of any individual player in the class. But Hosick can only be one recruit. He doesn't make up 5 recruits.
ETA - And that's not a reflection of any individual player in the class. But Hosick can only be one recruit. He doesn't make up 5 recruits.
This post was edited on 2/3/13 at 7:41 pm
Posted on 2/3/13 at 7:50 pm to reedus23
I don't understand Tulsa over us? How and why
Posted on 2/3/13 at 7:51 pm to reedus23
We have lots of players in this class to be excited about. And honestly, except for losing Mixon, we're exactly where we've been for a while now. I'd love to get EZE, but regardless will welcome all the new Tigers. 
Posted on 2/3/13 at 8:12 pm to semotruman
quote:
We have lots of players in this class to be excited about. And honestly, except for losing Mixon, we're exactly where we've been for a while now. I'd love to get EZE, but regardless will welcome all the new Tigers.
Exellent outlook. No sarcasm there. I feel the same way. WDIOW (we'll do it our way)The Mizzou way! Take it for what it's worth, but I still believe.
Tiger til the day I die.
Grest post SEMO!
Posted on 2/3/13 at 8:18 pm to reedus23
We need 2 of the 4 remaining targets to make this a solid class. If we get none of the 4.... its almost as bad as the '11 class.
Which was an AWFUL class and is killing our depth.
Which was an AWFUL class and is killing our depth.
Posted on 2/3/13 at 8:26 pm to URHatinIt
Well I obviously I'm concerned about line depth, especially on defense. But Hosick, Printz, Rhodes, Biesel, etc...there are bright spots. I hope we get all the remaining prospects, but at least 2 would be great.
Posted on 2/3/13 at 8:59 pm to semotruman
I think this class has a chance to be deeper than last years class. Certainly not as good at the top though.
Posted on 2/3/13 at 9:00 pm to URHatinIt
Lets not forget Chase Abbington dude's a player
Posted on 2/3/13 at 9:26 pm to reedus23
I don't understand Tulsa over us? How and why
Posted on 2/3/13 at 9:51 pm to TrueSon2014
My guess: Tulsa promised him he would be a TE. Mizzou did not.
Posted on 2/3/13 at 10:07 pm to URHatinIt
Maybe I'm wrong here but I think a lot of people are overlooking Beisel. I know he's definitely not a no-name, but that kid plays with passion and swagger that we desperately will need going forward. I think he's athletic, physical and instinctful and IMO he will be a guy who contributes, maybe special teams, right away and will walk out of Mizzou as one if the best from this class...if not the best.
Posted on 2/3/13 at 10:16 pm to AldonSmellsFear9
I like Beisel too. He's not a speedster sideline to sideline guy but he big and strong and could be a great up the middle run stuffer.
Posted on 2/3/13 at 10:30 pm to AldonSmellsFear9
Some underrated guys I'm high on in this class:
Sherrills: Very fast, big time playmaker. ESPN has 4 stars on him.
Loud: solid offer list. Read a few tweets when we got him the first that a lot of coaches were upset they didn't get him.
Moore: another good offer list. Good size, fluid in and out of breaks. Saw some one on ones with him last spring he was dominant. Louisville tried to bring him in for a visit.
Rhodes: offers from OU,LSU
Logan: 310 lbs. His coach thinks he'll play as a freshman
Sherrills: Very fast, big time playmaker. ESPN has 4 stars on him.
Loud: solid offer list. Read a few tweets when we got him the first that a lot of coaches were upset they didn't get him.
Moore: another good offer list. Good size, fluid in and out of breaks. Saw some one on ones with him last spring he was dominant. Louisville tried to bring him in for a visit.
Rhodes: offers from OU,LSU
Logan: 310 lbs. His coach thinks he'll play as a freshman
Posted on 2/3/13 at 10:50 pm to semotruman
quote:
Well I obviously I'm concerned about line depth, especially on defense. But Hosick, Printz, Rhodes, Biesel, etc...there are bright spots. I hope we get all the remaining prospects, but at least 2 would be great.
Good way to put it. What I was trying to say is I'm excited about the players we do have coming in and welcome them as Tigers. Would just like to see more numbers and depth.
Posted on 2/3/13 at 10:54 pm to reedus23
quote:
Good way to put it. What I was trying to say is I'm excited about the players we do have coming in and welcome them as Tigers. Would just like to see more numbers and depth.
Exactly. And UR brings up some more exciting names. I'm proud of all the young men that will be Tigers.
Page 144 of 155
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News