Started By
Message
re: mograyback needs to be banned. (quotes are from the last few HOURS)
Posted on 8/27/13 at 8:35 pm to cas4t
Posted on 8/27/13 at 8:35 pm to cas4t
You're kind of going off the reservation here.
I've got more respect for members of the armed forces than most anyone I know, but I don't see why his service affords him any additional protection.
If him being a prick is the reason for this thread and you asking for his banning, you should stick with that because the other thing is a non-starter.
I've got more respect for members of the armed forces than most anyone I know, but I don't see why his service affords him any additional protection.
If him being a prick is the reason for this thread and you asking for his banning, you should stick with that because the other thing is a non-starter.
This post was edited on 8/27/13 at 8:36 pm
1
Posted on 8/27/13 at 8:43 pm to Mizzeaux
Him being a prick is directly correlated to him bashing tbird who is in the AF.
I would not have started this thread had he just been talking to some random poster, who he had no idea what he/she did for a living.
I somehow managed to even miss this one.
I would not have started this thread had he just been talking to some random poster, who he had no idea what he/she did for a living.
I somehow managed to even miss this one.
quote:
By your really bad misuse of a big boy word at the top of the page, and your likely unimportant job at the USAF (guessing bc you spend your entire shifts on here making non stop comments) I'm gonna lean toward you're not real bright. Sociable, yes. Informed on sports, yes. Intelligent, not really
This post was edited on 8/27/13 at 8:44 pm
Posted on 8/27/13 at 8:45 pm to cas4t
quote:
And show me stats then to back up your claim.
I paged through the Help Board for about 6 or 7 pages. You have multiple requests for bans (4 or more). Didn't see anyone else (1 poster) who had more than 2. Does that count as stats?
quote:
degrading a US soldier
Tbird took it way better than you did from what I saw. I'd suggest if he left his jimmies in the unrustled position, you might do the same. And I don't think we need a monolithic position on our Armed Forces on this board. I've seen mogray be a douche to other military posters, but I still didn't think it was ban worthy.
Posted on 8/27/13 at 8:45 pm to cas4t
this thread has been 
Posted on 8/27/13 at 8:49 pm to the808bass
Well you're entitled to your opinion. But I for one, think that anyone bashing any sort of the US military should be banned. Not permanently or anything. But it should be a zero tolerance type rule.
And this site has been around for a long time bro. I've attempted to have some people banned as of late, but not in the long haul. We've had a sudden influx of new posters and teams that have really brought this place down lately.
Excuse me for missing the old days.
And this site has been around for a long time bro. I've attempted to have some people banned as of late, but not in the long haul. We've had a sudden influx of new posters and teams that have really brought this place down lately.
Excuse me for missing the old days.
This post was edited on 8/27/13 at 8:50 pm
Posted on 8/27/13 at 8:53 pm to cas4t
Posted on 8/27/13 at 8:54 pm to hawgfaninc
Damn right. I want this LSU site to keep it's quality.
Posted on 8/27/13 at 8:56 pm to cas4t
quote:
Well you're entitled to your opinion. But I for one, think that anyone bashing any sort of the US military should be banned. Not permanently or anything. But it should be a zero tolerance type rule.
As a veteran of the Armed Forces, I'd like to say that this is ludicrous.
I guess no one can say anything bad about fireman, paramedics, police, etc.
I think you'd be surprised to learn that most military types are pretty thick skinned. We can handle whatever grayback is trying to shove down our throats, without you playing ban police.
Posted on 8/27/13 at 8:58 pm to JimMorrison
Dude I see your name on the help board at least once a week 
Posted on 8/27/13 at 9:01 pm to Remote Controlled
I never said you couldn't handle it. That would be an insult. I said it should be banworthy.
And I also said you were entitled to your opinion, so I'm not sure what we're discussing anymore.
And I also said you were entitled to your opinion, so I'm not sure what we're discussing anymore.
Posted on 8/27/13 at 9:01 pm to MizzouSEC2012
I bet you do bro
Posted on 8/27/13 at 9:08 pm to cas4t
Secrant isn't an lsu site, but carry on.
Posted on 8/27/13 at 9:10 pm to Nortizzle
did you know all of your posts and username and password now work on Geaux.com? fun fact
Posted on 8/27/13 at 9:14 pm to cas4t
All I'm saying is that someone has quoted chicken saying these very words, "the Secrant is not an lsu site." don't get sidetracked with your thread.
Posted on 8/27/13 at 9:16 pm to Nortizzle
I thought you were trolling
but you actually took the bait
but you actually took the bait
Posted on 8/27/13 at 9:19 pm to cas4t
What? Cause I explained myself? 
Posted on 8/27/13 at 9:21 pm to cas4t
quote:
He's clearly a prick.
quote:
Yea, he's a real piece of work.
quote:
Are you fricking drunk?
quote:
You're just a piece of shite. I don't care how many Mizzou posters take up for you. You drunk frick.
quote:
No one likes a douchebag either, but you're still here. I think I'll be ok.
quote:
Fair enough. As long as you don't claim to have any common sense..
And I suppose these comments are adding to the conversation and discussion in some meaningful way. I would also assume you don't believe a person should respond in kind when being addressed as such.
Personally, I don't see much difference between the quotes you provided and these. If one is ban worthy isn't the other?
Posted on 8/27/13 at 9:21 pm to Nortizzle
No I meant by responding the post about about keeping the LSU site's quality. When you responded with "this isn't an lsu site" I thought you were playing along.
But it seems you weren't. I was baiting with that comment.
But it seems you weren't. I was baiting with that comment.
Posted on 8/27/13 at 9:23 pm to reedus23
I didn't bash his job in the military, for one.
But you're right, 2 wrongs don't make a right.
My apologies to the board.
But you're right, 2 wrongs don't make a right.
My apologies to the board.
Posted on 8/27/13 at 9:23 pm to reedus23
You should turn off your profanity filter.
Page 6 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News