Started By
Message
Admins - Are articles like this from The Advocate allowed on the SEC Rant
Posted on 5/12/13 at 2:22 pm
Posted on 5/12/13 at 2:22 pm
It's new and provides some good insight on Hill's legal possibilities, however, it has somewhat of a pessimistic tone.
Trying to be careful - Thanks!!
LINK
Trying to be careful - Thanks!!
LINK
1
Posted on 5/12/13 at 2:39 pm to Garfield
What's the point? This is an opinion piece based on news that was heavily covered here when it came out. Other than rubbing a wound what point is there to posting this article? It's been discussed.
Posted on 5/12/13 at 3:16 pm to jlbasm
First - everything i saw on the rant after the curfew judgment said this means he is going to be back with the team shortly. This article presents a contra view.
Second - it's the offseason. This is more interesting than anything nonbaseball related. There is a reason the writer wrote the story yesterday.
Third - I asked to post it on the SEC rant not the Tiger rant. There are 13 other fanbases. LSU fans don't have to read it if they don't want to hear the info.
Second - it's the offseason. This is more interesting than anything nonbaseball related. There is a reason the writer wrote the story yesterday.
Third - I asked to post it on the SEC rant not the Tiger rant. There are 13 other fanbases. LSU fans don't have to read it if they don't want to hear the info.
Posted on 5/12/13 at 3:23 pm to Garfield
I understand the secrant vs tiger. I guess I just wonder why other fan bases would care about an opinion piece on news from the beginning of the week about a team they don't care about. Why not go to the original hill threads from the beginning of the week and link the article in the original thread rather than start a new one. Maybe ask the credibility of the writer from those in the know about him (cenla tigers). Seems to be a less inflammatory approach IMO, which is worth what you paid for it 
Posted on 5/12/13 at 3:51 pm to jlbasm
Not bad advice.
I would think the teams that have to play LSU would care because Hill is really good.
Agree that going back to old thread would be less inflammatory usually, but the curfew judgment thread i read last weak was on the Tiger rant (and pretty sure i am not welcome there).
Thanks for the advise. If allowed to post i will ask about the author's credibility.
Posted on 5/13/13 at 8:29 am to jlbasm
quote:
I guess I just wonder why other fan bases would care about an opinion piece on news from the beginning of the week about a team they don't care about.
OP loves posting about LSU.
Posted on 5/13/13 at 8:36 am to wadewilson
Very true.
Posted on 5/13/13 at 9:41 am to Garfield
Admins are waiting for you to post this. Then you'll get your answer.
Posted on 5/13/13 at 9:57 am to sorantable
I'm on my phone so i can't post the Admiral Ackbar gif.
Posted on 5/13/13 at 10:32 am to Garfield
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News