re: Scouting Report. (South Carolina, 10/03)

quote:

---

3 sacks to 1, regardless of what stats we're using.

---

We're talking about UF here though and their pressure rate. We can start another thread on the differences in UGA and UF if you want

quote:

---

Pressure rate is completely subjective, which is why I use ESPN's hurry system.

---

And that's less subjective than the evidence I provided?

quote:

---

Regardless of how many times someone think he was pressured, he completed 71% of his passes for six touchdowns and over 400 yards.

---

I never said it wasn't an awesome day for him. I'm talking about whether there should be some concern or not about his OL pass pro when they face a more competent team.

quote:

---

Are hurries, an actual statistic that has measurement for the defensive players, not convenient for you?

---

Was the proof I provided for you not convenient for you?

Hurries are counted as a statistic while pressure is a wonky metric that has no real bearing whatsoever. That's why they track hurries and not pressures.

Trask was never uncomfortable in the Ole Miss game, as evidenced by the 400+ yards, six touchdown passes and zero turnovers.

He hit his fifth read on a play, for Peter's (sic) sake.

https://twitter.com/JRodgers11/status/1310742498462052352

No, we're not worried about pressure getting to Trask.

P.S., you never gave proof. You never posted a video, or gave any sort of evidence or reason for why you think pressure was a better statistic than a hurry (which is actually noted and designated to the defense for a reason).

quote:

---

Hurries are counted as a statistic while pressure is a wonky metric that has no real bearing whatsoever. That's why they track hurries and not pressures.

---

quote:

---

P.S., you never gave proof. You never posted a video, or gave any sort of evidence or reason for why you think pressure was a better statistic than a hurry (which is actually noted and designated to the defense for a reason).

---

Pressures are just an all encompassing stat that includes hurries, knockdowns, and sacks. It's still useful to look at and use. I don't have a preference for why one is better than the other. I just like looking at a multitude of things. I'm just asking if there's any reason for alarm if they play a team with a better front 7. You clearly don't think so which is fine. I just want see the OL hold up against a better front.

quote:

---

rask broke several records, longstanding Florida records. So I think we're pretty comfortable with it.

---

I hear you. I'm just looking at future games.