Started By
Message

Go Go Offense Write Up

Posted on 12/23/23 at 3:55 pm
Posted by Partha
Member since Jan 2022
6145 posts
Posted on 12/23/23 at 3:55 pm
With the rumors of Brennan Marion being a possible OC hire, here's a write up on his offense:

6 Formations from the GoGo Offense You Probably Haven't Seen Before

quote:

Brennan Marion's "GoGo" offense presents defenses with a lot of challenges.

For instance, the offense may have a split-back backfield but then have trips to the field as well. In order to be in trips while at the same time having two eligible players in the backfield means that one receiver will be “covered,” meaning that he cannot go downfield for a pass.

While this may sound like a disadvantage at first, there are a handful of benefits for running unbalanced formations. For one, defenses are not used to seeing such formations. Unbalanced formations can cause a lot of confusion and chaos on the defensive side of the ball, especially if an offense sugar huddles and lines up quickly. Additionally, many defenses will still cover the ineligible receiver, leaving one less defender to fill a gap. There are also times a defense will bring their extra corner over to help defend the covered receiver. By doing this, they vacate the perimeter on the side of the ball the corner abandoned. Some of these may look like a Wing-T formation, but as you can see, these have been adapted to the spread offense very well.

I found six plays that William & Mary used and was successful with. Every play is run out of an unbalanced formation, which again, means that there is one “covered” receiver.

William & Mary Zone Read Triple Option




Most teams that run Zone Read Triple with two RB’s will typically be split-back or have one RB in pistol with the other RB in a sidecar position. William and Mary likes to stack RB’s (both horizontally and vertically) together and “overload” them on either side of the QB.

On this specific play, the QB is reading the end man on the line of scrimmage, this being the DE. The DE crashes down and pursues the RB, telling the QB to keep it. The QB then reads the Outside LB. The LB decides to play the QB. The QB sees the LB commit to him, and pitches it to the pitch man (RB) and he takes it for a big gain.

William & Mary Quads Unbalanced - Zone Read Triple w/ Bubble




William and Mary line up in “Quads” to the field out of 10 personnel. The H is ineligible because this is an unbalanced formation, yet the defense covers him anyway. The defense “clovers” and brings the boundary corner over to the field. This creates a numbers advantage to the boundary. It is now five on five in the box.

This play is still Zone Read Triple Option, but instead of a running back in the backfield being the pitch man, he is substituted by the X running a bubble to the field. The QB’s reads remain the same. He reads the DE and then the Outside LB. The only thing that changes is that instead of having the option to pitch it to a RB, he now has the ability to sling the ball to the X on the bubble.

William & Mary Goal Line 12 Personnel Quads Unbalanced Wing



William and Mary run this play on the opponents two yard line. They once again line up in Quads out of 10 personnel, but the WR’s are all attached tightly to the line of scrimmage. This formation creates eight gaps to the right side of the center, and the defense only has six players accounting for them (six and a half if we count the nose). Unbalanced formations can stir up confusion in the defense and can many times create more gaps than they can defend.

This variation of Outside Zone has the Right Tackle down blocking on the three technique and the Right Guard pulling and looking for the most dangerous man. Everyone else is blocking their gap. When the ball was snapped on this play, the defense was still trying to figure out how to get lined up. The RB was able to walk in for the touchdown.

William & Mary Unbalanced Trips Counter Read


Here is another formation that you cannot be in without having an ineligible receiver. There are two RB’s in the backfield with three WR’s to the field. There is no other way to line up this way without being “unbalanced.”

The play that is called is Counter Read. At the snap, the RB runs lateral towards the field and the QB takes one slide step with him while reading the DE. If the DE charges the QB, he will hand it to the RB who will then have three blockers to the field. If the DE widens, the QB will keep it and follow his pullers. The Center, Right Guard, and Right Tackle down block while the Left Guard and Left Tackle pull and block their assignments (Playside DE and Playside LB). The Fullback works up to the corner.

William & Mary Twins Unbalanced Playaction Shot Play



Here is another unbalanced formation out of 21 personnel, this time where the offense uses play action. The Y, who is the ineligible receiver, stays inside to block. Also, the two RB’s are both to the left of the QB in William & Mary’s signature “stacked backfield” look.

On this play, the O-Line pass protects like they’re running Inside Zone to the right. The FB protects the edge to the field and the RB fakes the mesh with the QB and then sets up to protect. The Play-Action causes the LB’s and FS to come downhill, leaving two WR’s one on one to the field side. The H wins his match-up and scores on the post.

William & Mary Unbalanced H-Back Boot Slide



The defense lines up heavily to the H-Back, leaving the unbalanced side lighter and more vulnerable. The RB’s line up side by side once again, but this time they are behind the QB instead of beside him.

At the snap, the QB stretches the ball out to the RB and fakes Outside Zone to the left along with the O-Line. The majority of the defense flows with the play-action. After the brief fake, the QB boots back out to the unbalanced side where the Y and Z are blocking for the H on the Flat Route. The LB runs hard with the H, helping the QB decide to run it in himself through a giant gap that was vacated by the LB who pursued the Flat.
Posted by dbuchanon
Member since Nov 2014
19837 posts
Posted on 12/24/23 at 4:54 pm to
Thanks for sharing
Posted by dbuchanon
Member since Nov 2014
19837 posts
Posted on 12/24/23 at 7:04 pm to
Would’ve been fun to see it in the Swamp next yr


Maybe our next HC will hire him
Posted by Partha
Member since Jan 2022
6145 posts
Posted on 12/24/23 at 9:29 pm to


I know, by the time the admin/staff would be interested in hiring this guy he'll probably be fielding G5 HC offers.
Posted by jonnyanony
Member since Nov 2020
9918 posts
Posted on 12/25/23 at 7:02 pm to
Feels very Urban spread option circa 2004, which brings back fun memories but I'm surprised it's working so well nearly twenty years later.

Would be a great grab at this point but I don't think Napier is going to have anything but a figurehead OC and we'll get the same behind the LOS offense we got this year.
Posted by Partha
Member since Jan 2022
6145 posts
Posted on 12/25/23 at 8:05 pm to
quote:

Would be a great grab at this point but I don't think Napier is going to have anything but a figurehead OC and we'll get the same behind the LOS offense we got this year.


Sadly, I feel the same. I feel like his hires have been like his offense, for the most part, uninspired and underwhelming.

This off-season it could be blamed on Napier being on the hot seat, not many top names would be interested in risking it at what could be a one year stop if Napier gets fired in 2024, which seems pretty likely. That's why even though the rumor mill spouted out names like Patridge from Pitt or Ed O for DL coach, it ended up being Tulane's DL coach (who seems to be okay, but not exciting).

But even his first off-season some of the names that were thrown out for coordinator and position coaches were Seider, Tosh Lupoi, and even Tom Herman (as OC) and we ended up with Patrick Toney and Chris Sale (as a figurehead "Co-OC").

This would be a fun, exciting hire, one that is also a bit risky, but that doesn't seem to be Napier's MO unfortunately.
Posted by Partha
Member since Jan 2022
6145 posts
Posted on 12/25/23 at 8:07 pm to
quote:

I'm surprised it's working so well nearly twenty years later.

With the league getting so pass happy in the 2010s, (with the Briles offense and Kiffin opening things up at Alabama, etc) I wonder if defenses became so focused on defending the pass that the run has opened up more?

I'm not an X's and O's guy at all, but it would be interesting to hear from someone who knows about that stuff to chime in with some thoughts on that theory.
Posted by jonnyanony
Member since Nov 2020
9918 posts
Posted on 12/25/23 at 8:13 pm to
quote:

This off-season it could be blamed on Napier being on the hot seat, not many top names would be interested in risking it at what could be a one year stop if Napier gets fired in 2024, which seems pretty likely.


Not so sure. Younger coaches tend to have short tenures as they work their way up. Our offense will be set up with a lot of returning talent, a great OC could have some fun even if it was just another step up the ladder.

But yeah I don't see Napier changing into an aggressive offensive mind. I think he has more ego than he lets on.
Posted by Partha
Member since Jan 2022
6145 posts
Posted on 12/25/23 at 8:18 pm to
quote:

I think he has more ego than he lets on.


I spoke to a guy who's a mid-tier booster who is a lot closer to the program than me (gives about 20-100k) and he said the same. I don't know the extent of his interactions with Napier, but he claimed to have a little insight in the program.

He said Napier is extremely stubborn and something along of the lines of "humbly arrogant". I forgot the exact words he used, but he basically said that Napier is too sure of himself despite his homely down-to-earth demeanor. He did say that he is legitimately a nice, caring guy, but that he is not as open minded or introspective as his press clippings suggest.

I thought that the booster was just projecting that onto Napier, but as time goes on, I'm beginning to concede that he may be right.
Posted by Partha
Member since Jan 2022
6145 posts
Posted on 12/25/23 at 8:20 pm to
quote:

Not so sure. Younger coaches tend to have short tenures as they work their way up. Our offense will be set up with a lot of returning talent, a great OC could have some fun even if it was just another step up the ladder.


I was talking in general as it is speculated that the reason why it took so long for us to announce the replacements for Spencer and Raymond was that Napier was turned down a lot because his seat is hot.
Posted by theCAW
Polk County
Member since Dec 2023
2296 posts
Posted on 12/25/23 at 8:26 pm to
Uaa blocked it



This post was edited on 12/26/23 at 1:55 am
Posted by jonnyanony
Member since Nov 2020
9918 posts
Posted on 12/25/23 at 8:35 pm to
quote:

I was talking in general as it is speculated that the reason why it took so long for us to announce the replacements for Spencer and Raymond was that Napier was turned down a lot because his seat is hot.


Entirely possible, but getting a shot to jump from UNLV to the SEC is a huge career opportunity, even if Billy gets shitcanned next year.
Posted by Partha
Member since Jan 2022
6145 posts
Posted on 12/25/23 at 8:37 pm to
quote:

Entirely possible, but getting a shot to jump from UNLV to the SEC is a huge career opportunity, even if Billy gets shitcanned next year.

For sure. I actually read in the message board rumor mill that the interest was from the side of the UNLV OC, not Napier's.

Marion also doesn't have a history of staying at a stop too long so history suggests that he wouldn't seem to mind a lack of stability.
Posted by jonnyanony
Member since Nov 2020
9918 posts
Posted on 12/25/23 at 8:42 pm to
quote:

Marion also doesn't have a history of staying at a stop too long so history suggests that he wouldn't seem to mind a lack of stability.


Yep. Really common pattern for assistants trying to move up quickly.

He's jumped from D2 to FCS to G5 pretty quickly. If he's looking for an NFL or top flight college gig, a year at Florida wouldn't hurt if he was allowed to run his offense.
This post was edited on 12/25/23 at 8:43 pm
Posted by Partha
Member since Jan 2022
6145 posts
Posted on 12/25/23 at 8:46 pm to
quote:

If he's looking for an NFL or top flight college gig, a year at Florida wouldn't hurt if he was allowed to run his offense.
Especially if it proves to be effective against a schedule like UF has in 2024.
Posted by jonnyanony
Member since Nov 2020
9918 posts
Posted on 12/25/23 at 8:49 pm to
I have no clue what next year will look like, but probably not good W/L wise.

But returning Mertz and our WR/TE corps bodes well for offense. Working in lagway would give him a chance to get that QB run threat he needs.
Posted by Partha
Member since Jan 2022
6145 posts
Posted on 12/25/23 at 8:52 pm to
quote:

I have no clue what next year will look like, but probably not good W/L wise.

I just hope we have some semblance of a defense for the first time since, I guess 2019 (even then it only overwhelmed bad teams and folded against a pretty average UGA offense and some other teams that were not as overmatched talent-wise). In 2019 we had some talent in the front 7 with the UL transfer Greenard and I think it was Polite at DT who caused trouble for opposing offenses. Our secondary sort of sucked that year, and by 2020 the entire defense had fallen to complete shite.
Posted by jonnyanony
Member since Nov 2020
9918 posts
Posted on 12/25/23 at 8:58 pm to
I'm not very hopeful about our defense but any improvement at all gives us a fighting chance.

Defense killed us at UK, ARK, MIZZ and FSU.

We handed back victories because we couldn't stop shite.
Posted by Partha
Member since Jan 2022
6145 posts
Posted on 12/25/23 at 9:04 pm to
quote:

Defense killed us at UK, ARK, MIZZ and FSU.

I'd add LSU to that list. I know Daniels is good, won the Heisman, etc but we scored 35 that game, and had the lead later in the 3rd quarter but the defense was completely non-existent.

A few stops here and there could have given us a chance.
Posted by jonnyanony
Member since Nov 2020
9918 posts
Posted on 12/25/23 at 9:21 pm to
quote:

I'd add LSU to that list. I know Daniels is good, won the Heisman, etc but we scored 35 that game, and had the lead later in the 3rd quarter but the defense was completely non-existent.

A few stops here and there could have given us a chance.


My next pick would be USC, which we luckily won, but my god they scored 39 points and nearly 500 yards on us.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter