View in: Desktop
Copyright @2019 SECRant.com. All rights reserved.
Posted by
Message
College Coach Grading SystemPosted by olemc999
on 1/9/19 at 3:25 pm



So today I am introducing to all of you a system I created called the college coach grading system, CCGS for short. It is essentially a grading system using an algebraic formula I devised to a grade a college coaches performance (final rankings, total wins, bowl bids, bowl wins, prestigious bowl wins, etc.) versus the talent he has (acquired talent from previous coaching regime, talent he himself has recruited).
The most important thing to remember is that it is a final grade of that season. It is a grading system not a prognostication system. However you can use the numbers to make some educated guesses on your team’s future.
The formula is called TIRTCO (Talent Input Relative To Coaching Output). The talent portion of the equation is the last 4 recruiting class’s average vs the final rankings and bonus points for achievements. Not going to give the exact formula because I am actually going to start my own website. You never know ESPN, Rivals, and 247 might be lurking this post right now.
The theory is that if you get the #1 recruiting classes consistently than you should be winning NC’s if you are even an average to above average coach. A coach getting consistently classes in the 50’s and finishing in the top 25 is doubling his output. There is another grade called ORCA (Overall Recruiting & Coaching Ability). The ORCA grade takes the TIRTCO score and also puts more emphasis on the recruiting prowess of the coach. Think of the ORCA grade as a CEO type of grade.
I recognize there are flaws and outliers to this system (injuries, transfers, sanctions, etc.) but I still think it paints a solid picture.
The TIRTCO score gives you a number grade that gives you a conclusion statement.
The TIRTCO score scale.
0.249 - 0.001 = Terrible
0.499 - 0.250 = Bad
0.999 - 0.500 = Below Average
1 = “The Standard”
1.001 – 1.499 = Average
1.500 – 1.999 = Above Average
2.000 – 2.499 = Good
2.500 – 2.999 = Great
3.000+ = Elite
The most important thing to remember is that it is a final grade of that season. It is a grading system not a prognostication system. However you can use the numbers to make some educated guesses on your team’s future.
The formula is called TIRTCO (Talent Input Relative To Coaching Output). The talent portion of the equation is the last 4 recruiting class’s average vs the final rankings and bonus points for achievements. Not going to give the exact formula because I am actually going to start my own website. You never know ESPN, Rivals, and 247 might be lurking this post right now.
The theory is that if you get the #1 recruiting classes consistently than you should be winning NC’s if you are even an average to above average coach. A coach getting consistently classes in the 50’s and finishing in the top 25 is doubling his output. There is another grade called ORCA (Overall Recruiting & Coaching Ability). The ORCA grade takes the TIRTCO score and also puts more emphasis on the recruiting prowess of the coach. Think of the ORCA grade as a CEO type of grade.
I recognize there are flaws and outliers to this system (injuries, transfers, sanctions, etc.) but I still think it paints a solid picture.
The TIRTCO score gives you a number grade that gives you a conclusion statement.
The TIRTCO score scale.
0.249 - 0.001 = Terrible
0.499 - 0.250 = Bad
0.999 - 0.500 = Below Average
1 = “The Standard”
1.001 – 1.499 = Average
1.500 – 1.999 = Above Average
2.000 – 2.499 = Good
2.500 – 2.999 = Great
3.000+ = Elite
This post was edited on 1/9 at 3:26 pm
So without further ado I present to you the 2018 SEC CCGS grade rankings.
01 – UK, Stoops 3.080 Elite
02 - UF, Mullen 2.351 Good
03 – UA, Saban 2.140 Good
04 – LSU, Orgeron 1.488 Average
05 – MIZ, Odom 1.235 Average
06 – A&M, Fisher 1.117 Average
07 - VAN, Mason 1.036 Average
08 – MSU, Moorhead 1.003 Average
09 – UGA, Smart 0.956 Below Average
10 – USC, Muschamp 0.633 Below Average
11 – AU, Malzahn 0.443 Bad
12 – OM, Luke 0.309 Bad
13 – ARK, Morris 0.293 Bad
14 – UT, Pruitt 0.283 Bad
01 – UK, Stoops 3.080 Elite
02 - UF, Mullen 2.351 Good
03 – UA, Saban 2.140 Good
04 – LSU, Orgeron 1.488 Average
05 – MIZ, Odom 1.235 Average
06 – A&M, Fisher 1.117 Average
07 - VAN, Mason 1.036 Average
08 – MSU, Moorhead 1.003 Average
09 – UGA, Smart 0.956 Below Average
10 – USC, Muschamp 0.633 Below Average
11 – AU, Malzahn 0.443 Bad
12 – OM, Luke 0.309 Bad
13 – ARK, Morris 0.293 Bad
14 – UT, Pruitt 0.283 Bad
The ORCA (Overall Recruiting & Coaching Ability) rankings aka the “CEO” grade which favors recruiting 60% to 40% coaching using the TIRTCO score and recruit rankings.
01 – UA, Saban 145.14
02 – LSU, Orgeron 139.24
03 - UF, Mullen 132.85
04 – A&M, Fisher 131.37
05 – MSU, Moorhead 121.75
06 – UK, Stoops 113.58
07 – UGA, Smart 111.96
08 – MIZ, Odom 107.73
09 – AU, Malzahn 105.94
10 – UT, Pruitt 101.28
11 – USC, Muschamp 094.63
12 – OM, Luke 094.06
13 - VAN, Mason 093.54
14 – ARK, Morris 085.29
01 – UA, Saban 145.14
02 – LSU, Orgeron 139.24
03 - UF, Mullen 132.85
04 – A&M, Fisher 131.37
05 – MSU, Moorhead 121.75
06 – UK, Stoops 113.58
07 – UGA, Smart 111.96
08 – MIZ, Odom 107.73
09 – AU, Malzahn 105.94
10 – UT, Pruitt 101.28
11 – USC, Muschamp 094.63
12 – OM, Luke 094.06
13 - VAN, Mason 093.54
14 – ARK, Morris 085.29
Thanks to all you Gators for viewing my system. And in return I give you my gratitude.
Image: https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/a3/f8/7d/a3f87d05ebd397d3ebc375943afce611.jpg
Image: https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/9a/0d/a9/9a0da995c70adbb0b956dbf2918acd1e.jpg
Image: https://bigpapadaddy.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/floridagatorgirl.jpg?w=500&h=709
Image: https://i.pinimg.com/736x/f8/e5/06/f8e5061e93048d0c582818f47f651ea6--dolphins-cheerleaders-sexy-cheerleaders.jpg
Image: http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_p4QA-5qI1yQ/TH8ylz3-bDI/AAAAAAAAAvk/30bbPI1_oAg/s1600/sexy-uf-gator-girls-26.jpg
Image: https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/f4/f6/f4/f4f6f4afbee2ee4a4f1feca7a50837fd.jpg
Image: https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/a3/f8/7d/a3f87d05ebd397d3ebc375943afce611.jpg
Image: https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/9a/0d/a9/9a0da995c70adbb0b956dbf2918acd1e.jpg
Image: https://bigpapadaddy.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/floridagatorgirl.jpg?w=500&h=709
Image: https://i.pinimg.com/736x/f8/e5/06/f8e5061e93048d0c582818f47f651ea6--dolphins-cheerleaders-sexy-cheerleaders.jpg
Image: http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_p4QA-5qI1yQ/TH8ylz3-bDI/AAAAAAAAAvk/30bbPI1_oAg/s1600/sexy-uf-gator-girls-26.jpg
Image: https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/f4/f6/f4/f4f6f4afbee2ee4a4f1feca7a50837fd.jpg
This post was edited on 1/11 at 12:55 pm
re: College Coach Grading SystemPosted by StrawsDrawnAtRandom
on 1/9/19 at 9:31 pm to olemc999

It's interesting because Stoops had an Elite year but I wonder how often he can replicate the success?
Other interesting pieces: Mullen finishes top three in both.
Kirby is pretty much a middle of the pack HC, but again: It will be very interesting to see how he does next year.
Surprised no one has come for Stoops, a bigger program. Miami could have had a steal.
Other interesting pieces: Mullen finishes top three in both.
Kirby is pretty much a middle of the pack HC, but again: It will be very interesting to see how he does next year.
Surprised no one has come for Stoops, a bigger program. Miami could have had a steal.
re: College Coach Grading SystemPosted by Gatorbait2008
on 1/10/19 at 1:01 pm to olemc999

Introduce this to the main board
re: College Coach Grading SystemPosted by olemc999
on 1/10/19 at 1:57 pm to Gatorbait2008

It will just turn into a troll thread.
re: College Coach Grading SystemPosted by olemc999
on 1/10/19 at 2:13 pm to StrawsDrawnAtRandom

If Stoops has another year like this one a big time program will give him a look.
He did have an elite year, he won the 2018 SEC Coach of the Year award. That dumbfounding Tennessee lost kept him from winning bigger national coach of the year awards imo.
Kirby graded as what me and you have always believed. Average to mediocre coach with elite talent.
I am going to start working on what the TIRTCO score is for past years performances and come up with TIRTCO and ORCA career average grade. Also will build a CSI (Coach Stock Index) a simple graph chart to progressions and regressions year to year to understand baselines and tangents.
He did have an elite year, he won the 2018 SEC Coach of the Year award. That dumbfounding Tennessee lost kept him from winning bigger national coach of the year awards imo.
Kirby graded as what me and you have always believed. Average to mediocre coach with elite talent.
I am going to start working on what the TIRTCO score is for past years performances and come up with TIRTCO and ORCA career average grade. Also will build a CSI (Coach Stock Index) a simple graph chart to progressions and regressions year to year to understand baselines and tangents.
re: College Coach Grading SystemPosted by finchmeister08
on 1/10/19 at 4:17 pm to olemc999

Especially if you don’t tease at how the calcs work.
re: College Coach Grading SystemPosted by olemc999
on 1/10/19 at 4:38 pm to finchmeister08

Trust me, I know that 

SR Sponsor
SR Fan
USA
Member since 2001

USA
Member since 2001
Thank you for supporting our sponsors Posted by Site Sponsor
to Everyone


Advertisement
re: College Coach Grading SystemPosted by olemc999
on 1/10/19 at 4:40 pm to StrawsDrawnAtRandom

Currently working on ACC grades.
re: College Coach Grading SystemPosted by bengalbait
on 1/11/19 at 7:19 am to olemc999

Nice job olemc999. 

2018 ACC CCGS TIRTCO Grade Rankings
01 – CLEM, Swinney 14.935 Elite
02 - SYR, Babers 3.927 Elite
03 – BC, Addazio 1.778 Above Average
04 – WF, Clawson 1.540 Above Average
05 – DUKE, Cutcliffe 1.539 Above Average
06 – UVA, Mendenhall 1.492 Average
07 – NC ST, Doeren 1.405 Average
08 – PITT, Narduzzi 1.219 Average
09 – GT, Johnson 1.079 Average
10 – VT, Fuente 0.517 Below Average
11 – MIA, Richt 0.409 Bad
12 – LSVL, Petrino 0.348 Bad
13 – UNC, Fedora 0.263 Bad
14 – FSU, Taggart 0.142 Terrible
01 – CLEM, Swinney 14.935 Elite
02 - SYR, Babers 3.927 Elite
03 – BC, Addazio 1.778 Above Average
04 – WF, Clawson 1.540 Above Average
05 – DUKE, Cutcliffe 1.539 Above Average
06 – UVA, Mendenhall 1.492 Average
07 – NC ST, Doeren 1.405 Average
08 – PITT, Narduzzi 1.219 Average
09 – GT, Johnson 1.079 Average
10 – VT, Fuente 0.517 Below Average
11 – MIA, Richt 0.409 Bad
12 – LSVL, Petrino 0.348 Bad
13 – UNC, Fedora 0.263 Bad
14 – FSU, Taggart 0.142 Terrible
This post was edited on 1/13 at 11:07 am
The ORCA (Overall Recruiting & Coaching Ability) rankings aka the “CEO” grade which favors recruiting 60% to 40% coaching using the TIRTCO score and recruit rankings.
2018 ACC ORCA Grade Rankings
01 – CLEM, Swinney 149.19
02 – FSU, Taggart 109.25
03 – PITT, Narduzzi 105.25
04 – NC ST, Doeren 105.00
05 – MIA, Richt 097.75
06 – DUKE, Cutcliffe 096.25
07 – GT, Johnson 093.50
08 - SYR, Babers 089.25
09 – UNC, Fedora 087.75
10 – UVA, Mendenhall 087.50
11 – WF, Clawson 085.00
12 – VT, Fuente 084.75
13 – LSVL, Petrino 081.25
14 – BC, Addazio 076.00
2018 ACC ORCA Grade Rankings
01 – CLEM, Swinney 149.19
02 – FSU, Taggart 109.25
03 – PITT, Narduzzi 105.25
04 – NC ST, Doeren 105.00
05 – MIA, Richt 097.75
06 – DUKE, Cutcliffe 096.25
07 – GT, Johnson 093.50
08 - SYR, Babers 089.25
09 – UNC, Fedora 087.75
10 – UVA, Mendenhall 087.50
11 – WF, Clawson 085.00
12 – VT, Fuente 084.75
13 – LSVL, Petrino 081.25
14 – BC, Addazio 076.00
re: College Coach Grading SystemPosted by boXerrumble
on 1/13/19 at 10:44 am to olemc999

quote:
14 – FSU, Taggart 0.142 Terrible
Basically confirms everything we’ve said about Taggert.
Great recruiter, terrible coach. Unless he hires some really good assistants, he’s going to flame out in another year or 2.
re: College Coach Grading SystemPosted by StrawsDrawnAtRandom
on 1/13/19 at 11:17 am to boXerrumble

Even I have to admit that he's held onto the class he's had is impressive after the year that he's had.
2018 BIG 12 CCGS TIRTCO Grade Rankings
01 – OU, Riley 4.188 Elite
02 – WV, Holgorsen 2.210 Good
03 – UT, Herman 1.785 Above Average
04 – ISU, Campbell 1.592 Above Average
05 – OK. ST, Gundy 0.946 Below Average
06 – BU, Rhule 0.859 Below Average
07 – KSU, Snyder 0.812 Below Average
08 – TCU, Patterson 0.734 Below Average
09 – KU, Beaty 0.706 Below Average
10 – TT, Kingsbury 0.636 Below Average
01 – OU, Riley 4.188 Elite
02 – WV, Holgorsen 2.210 Good
03 – UT, Herman 1.785 Above Average
04 – ISU, Campbell 1.592 Above Average
05 – OK. ST, Gundy 0.946 Below Average
06 – BU, Rhule 0.859 Below Average
07 – KSU, Snyder 0.812 Below Average
08 – TCU, Patterson 0.734 Below Average
09 – KU, Beaty 0.706 Below Average
10 – TT, Kingsbury 0.636 Below Average
This post was edited on 1/16 at 5:21 pm
The ORCA (Overall Recruiting & Coaching Ability) rankings aka the “CEO” grade which favors recruiting 60% to 40% coaching using the TIRTCO score and recruit rankings.
2018 BIG 12 ORCA Grade Rankings
01 – UT, Herman 133.75
02 – OU, Riley 132.25
03 – WV, Holgorsen 103.50
04 – ISU, Campbell 088.50
05 – TCU, Patterson 086.75
06 – BU, Rhule 078.75
07 – OK. ST, Gundy 075.75
08 – TT, Kingsbury 065.75
09 – KSU, Snyder 051.75
10 – KU, Beaty 046.50
2018 BIG 12 ORCA Grade Rankings
01 – UT, Herman 133.75
02 – OU, Riley 132.25
03 – WV, Holgorsen 103.50
04 – ISU, Campbell 088.50
05 – TCU, Patterson 086.75
06 – BU, Rhule 078.75
07 – OK. ST, Gundy 075.75
08 – TT, Kingsbury 065.75
09 – KSU, Snyder 051.75
10 – KU, Beaty 046.50
Popular
Back to top
