Started By
Message
re: TU is all hat and no cattle
Posted on 9/2/21 at 2:54 pm to BigBro
Posted on 9/2/21 at 2:54 pm to BigBro
Well you averaged
4 losses per season in the 70’s
5 losses per season in the 80’s
5 losses per season in the 90’s
And 5 losses per season in the 2010’s
The 2000’s is the only decade you’ve done better in the last 4 decades
You tell me, if a successful 10 year average for you is 4 losses, then fine by longhorn standards you’ve had 2 successful decades out of the last 4
I counted 169 losses for texas university in the 70’s 80’s 90’s 2010’s
4 losses per season in the 70’s
5 losses per season in the 80’s
5 losses per season in the 90’s
And 5 losses per season in the 2010’s
The 2000’s is the only decade you’ve done better in the last 4 decades
You tell me, if a successful 10 year average for you is 4 losses, then fine by longhorn standards you’ve had 2 successful decades out of the last 4
I counted 169 losses for texas university in the 70’s 80’s 90’s 2010’s
This post was edited on 9/2/21 at 3:00 pm
2
Posted on 9/2/21 at 3:27 pm to Old Sarge
quote:
4 losses per season in the 70’s
We won a NC and played for another in the 70s
We won 6 Conference Championships in the 70s
I would consider that successful..
quote:
5 losses per season in the 80’s
We played for a NC in the 80s..
We won 1 CC in the 80s..
I would consider that NOT successful..
quote:
5 losses per season in the 90’s
We won 4 CC during the 90s..
I would consider that decent, but NOT successful
quote:
The 2000’s is the only decade you’ve done better in the last 4 decades
We won a NC and played for another..
We won 2 CC..
I would consider that successful
quote:
And 5 losses per season in the 2010’s
I would consider this past decade NOT successful.
So I would consider 2 of the last 5 decades successful, and another one of those 5 that was decent.
Would you say A&M has had any successful decades in the past 50 years?
Posted on 9/2/21 at 4:07 pm to Old Sarge
quote:
You tell me, if a successful 10 year average for you is 4 losses, then fine by longhorn standards you’ve had 2 successful decades out of the last 4
Look, I'm all for piling on Tejas, but you've arbitrarily selected decades as your measuring stick. If you want to measure successful "ten year averages," as your post states, then it's clear Tejas has had some incredibly successful. They just haven't put it together for years 19X0 - 19X9 or 20X0 - 20X9.
1961-1970 - 89-17-2 (1.7 losses per season)
1967-1976 - 85-24-2 (2.4 losses per season)
1968-1977 - 90-20-2 (2.0 losses per season)
1977-1986 - 86-31-2 (3.1 losses per season)
2000-2009 - 110-19 (1.9 losses per season)
This post was edited on 9/2/21 at 4:08 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News