Started By
Message

re: Georgia's whining again

Posted on 9/10/08 at 11:52 am to
Posted by tubucoco
las vegas, nevada
Member since Oct 2007
32994 posts
Posted on 9/10/08 at 11:52 am to
in the first place they should never have been ranked that high, thus avoiding the controversy, LSU, even though upset by Ark., should have not dropped below Ga. because they were still going to the SECCG and Ga. was not. that's why the media, sportswriters, etc. are a joke, they really don't know what in the hell their doing when it comes to voting.
Posted by SouthEndzoneTiger
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2008
10618 posts
Posted on 9/10/08 at 7:00 pm to
quote:

in the first place they should never have been ranked that high, thus avoiding the controversy, LSU, even though upset by Ark., should have not dropped below Ga. because they were still going to the SECCG and Ga. was not. that's why the media, sportswriters, etc. are a joke, they really don't know what in the hell their doing when it comes to voting.


I agree with this 110%. The voters should have realized that they would have the opportunity to have UGA ahead of LSU IF LSU would have lost to Tenn. They must have known that if LSU beat Tenn they were all going to leap LSU ahead of UGA, so why put UGA ahead of LSU before the game? Most of the voters have no clue.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter