Started By
Message
re: Pitts
Posted on 4/16/21 at 10:26 pm to SteelerBravesDawg
Posted on 4/16/21 at 10:26 pm to SteelerBravesDawg
quote:
I stated reasons a couple of posts above. You just chose not to read them.
quote:
Eh. Thing is, he's not really a TE. He's a WR posing as a TE. He's a freak.
Fontenot said in his introductory presser that he believes in BPA. Well if Pitts is there at 4, he will be the BPA, and if Fontenot is true to his word then he'll be the pick.
That's your argument? That's nothing but opinion besides Fontenot's statement. You've done nothing to prove he's the better take than Sewell.
quote:
And anyone who thinks Pitts ain't the better player needs to stick to soccer, b/c football ain't for them.
See, this shite isn't necessary. It's just you being an a-hole and it's not needed. Maybe actually provide some facts instead just being a douche about it acting like your opinion is better than anyone else's.
2
Posted on 4/17/21 at 7:18 am to Porter Osborne Jr
quote:
See, this shite isn't necessary.
Insert Morgan Freeman “he’s right you know.”
Save it for fighting with Saints fans. Haha!
Posted on 4/17/21 at 7:26 am to Porter Osborne Jr
I just think it's crazy to think that Sewell is a better player than Pitts. Pitts is arguably the best player in the entire draft, and if he were a QB he'd be the consensus #1 pick. Sewell is very good don't get me wrong, but he's not Pitts.
This post was edited on 4/17/21 at 7:38 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News