quote:
Leftist 9th circuit court says NCAA can’t restrict benefits to college athletes
Opens the door for paying players
Nobody was allowed a voice and one court is trying to ruin it for everyone
NCAA opposes it. AGs in red states agree with NCAA.

If Supreme Court upholds 9th circuit ruling it will cost universities a ton of money in the athletic Dept leading to the cancelling of non revenue sports so they can pay players in revenue generating sports.

And what is not mentioned is no women sports generate revenue and you’d run into title IX issues if you only had men’s basketball and football.

So essentially say bye bye to college sports if this stands. Which of course is the ultimate goal of the left

Yeah a ton of sports will be gone. Using your school for example:

Mississippi State University spent $23,381,107 on men's teams and received $36,893,213 in revenue. On average, Mississippi State University gave male athletes $13,268 in sports related student aid.

Mississippi State University spent $7,176,396 on women's teams and received $7,176,396 in revenue. On average, Mississippi State University gave female athletes $13,146 in sports related student aid.

I'm willing bet that the revenue from Men sports is given to womens to help make up short falls.

Bama:

The University of Alabama spent $49,153,026 on men's teams and received $94,508,732 in revenue. On average, The University of Alabama gave male athletes $16,781 in sports related student aid.

Women's Sports

The University of Alabama spent $15,395,726 on women's teams and received $6,993,413 in revenue. On average, The University of Alabama gave female athletes $15,899 in sports related student aid.