Started By
Message

re: Brian Harsin: By the numbers

Posted on 12/23/20 at 11:04 am to
Posted by BoarEd
The Hills
Member since Oct 2015
38862 posts
Posted on 12/23/20 at 11:04 am to
quote:

I'll make it simple: You believe Harsin is a shitty coach despite his .780 winning percentage because - why, exactly?


Find a post of me saying that Hardin is a shitty coach. I never said that. I said it was a bad hire, but that doesn't mean he is a shitty coach.

With the advantages he had over his peers at Boise, you guys needed a guy who won more like 85% of his games if you intend to compete with Sabans. I doubt Harsin lasts more than 3 years for you guys.

Sure, he will win you some games, but he will be spanked by Sabans every time. He will lose to other teams around the league as well. As we all know, beating Sabans is the metric your decision makers use.
This post was edited on 12/23/20 at 11:15 am
Posted by dchog
Pea Ridge
Member since Nov 2012
22961 posts
Posted on 12/23/20 at 11:11 am to
I think he is an average to good hire. I think Auburn was just tired of Malzahn and when a coach gets to that 8-10 year seasons then it is time to make a change.

The same happened to Miles and Richt.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter