I'm with you. Use to be composite was the measuring stick. Now it seems a lot of recruitniks just go by whichever has their guys ranked higher. Remember one school in particular all they ever mentioned was composite. Nothing else mattered. Not so much anymore. That was back in the day when they had #1 class about 10 years in a row.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by DawgsLife

Member since Jun 2013

59007 posts

Posted on 11/21/20 at 9:43 am to 167back

quote:
I'm with you. Use to be composite was the measuring stick. Now it seems a lot of recruitniks just go by whichever has their guys ranked higher. Remember one school in particular all they ever mentioned was composite. Nothing else mattered. Not so much anymore. That was back in the day when they had #1 class about 10 years in a row.

Composite is pretty much my go to. mainly because they a have something different, and some can be wildly different in opinion. Composite being an average seems like it might be the most accurate as far as an overall class, but certainly for individual players one service has to be more accurate than others.....of course which one is most accurate could change from player to player.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by TideSaint

Hill Country

Member since Sep 2008

75955 posts

Posted on 11/24/20 at 9:21 am to 167back

quote:
Remember one school in particular all they ever mentioned was composite. Nothing else mattered. Not so much anymore. That was back in the day when they had #1 class about 10 years in a row.

Uh, I assume you are talking about Alabama here.

Who from our fan base hasn't referenced the Composite when discussing rankings?