Started By
Message

re: South Carolina went 33-6 from ‘11-‘13, but surprisingly no divisional title

Posted on 6/30/20 at 5:38 pm to
Posted by Mithridates6
Member since Oct 2019
8220 posts
Posted on 6/30/20 at 5:38 pm to
The thing is, y'all didn't even get any BCS at large bids during that stretch. Just brutal
Posted by 2014cock
Member since Apr 2011
628 posts
Posted on 6/30/20 at 6:06 pm to
Right. Wasn't that limited to 2 per conference at the time?

We were playing in Outback/Capital One Bowls meanwhile teams like Northern Illinois, random Big East teams, and an unranked Wisconsin team played in BCS bowls. Not to mention while we were beating Clemson plenty during that stretch, they got to play in BCS bowls.

Posted by theGarnetWay
Washington, D.C.
Member since Mar 2010
25878 posts
Posted on 6/30/20 at 6:57 pm to
quote:

The thing is, y'all didn't even get any BCS at large bids during that stretch. Just brutal


Yeah, as mentioned it was due to the conference limit. We beat Clemson and won @UCF that year. That was their only loss of the season on their way to winning the Fiesta Bowl.

Clemson went to a BCS game that year two.

I can’t remember if this was or stayed accurate but at the time Spurrier said something about being the only team to have beaten 2 BCS bound teams in one year.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter