Started By
Message
re: Since 2000, What SEC Team Has Overachieved & Underachieved Most?
Posted on 6/30/20 at 1:59 pm to Solo Cam
Posted on 6/30/20 at 1:59 pm to Solo Cam
quote:
With zero national titles
And...?
quote:
In 2001 if Tennessee beats LSU then they go to the natty.
And get ran by Miami. What's your point? If 2012 Georgia defeats Alabama they not only go to the national title, they win it.
quote:
Your wrong but whatever makes you feel better
I'm not wrong. Tennessee was the second winningest program in the SEC in the 1990s and the second winningest program in the SEC of all-time. From 2000-Present they are 146-104 (a winning percentage of .584). Georgia in that same time period is 198-67 (a winning percentage of .747). Looking at the two programs' historical winning percentages (Tennessee - .674; Georgia - .655) it's actually arguable that Georgia has overachieved since the year 2000.
2
Posted on 6/30/20 at 2:09 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
RollTide1987
You are now experiencing what our fans deal with everyday on here with the "hurrrr durrrr 1980" drivel.
You are making rational points that can't be refuted with any real logic, yet you have countless people saying how wrong you are simply because it's UGA being discussed. Pretty sad isn't it?
ETA: if this was a blind question with team names removed and only the black and white, irrefutable data was posted everyone in the universe would pick Tennessee as the team that's most underachieved.
This post was edited on 6/30/20 at 2:11 pm
Posted on 6/30/20 at 2:14 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
And get ran by Miami. What's your point? If 2012 Georgia defeats Alabama they not only go to the national title, they win it.
You don’t know that
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News