Started By
Message
re: Since 2000, What SEC Team Has Overachieved & Underachieved Most?
Posted on 6/30/20 at 1:43 pm to RollTide1987
Posted on 6/30/20 at 1:43 pm to RollTide1987
quote:With zero national titles
they are still #3 in the SEC in overall wins since 2000
Bama has 5
LSU has 3
Florida has 2
Auburn has 1 (should have been 2)
quote:
have won multiple conference championships, and have been in a position to actually win a national title.
But they didn’t win the title. In 2001 if Tennessee beats LSU then they go to the natty.
This isn’t horseshoes. You win it all or you don’t.
quote:
Now you can say that Georgia has superior resources to Tennessee and you'd be correct. That has always been the case, however. Tennessee had to survive by recruiting nationally and they were pretty damn good at doing that, especially in Fulmer's more formative years.
Ok? Georgia has more resources by a mile- we agree. They both have zero national titles while Georgia has more wins.
quote:Your wrong but whatever makes you feel better
Compared to where the two programs were in January 2000, Tennessee is definitely the bigger of the two underachievers.
1
Posted on 6/30/20 at 1:59 pm to Solo Cam
quote:
With zero national titles
And...?
quote:
In 2001 if Tennessee beats LSU then they go to the natty.
And get ran by Miami. What's your point? If 2012 Georgia defeats Alabama they not only go to the national title, they win it.
quote:
Your wrong but whatever makes you feel better
I'm not wrong. Tennessee was the second winningest program in the SEC in the 1990s and the second winningest program in the SEC of all-time. From 2000-Present they are 146-104 (a winning percentage of .584). Georgia in that same time period is 198-67 (a winning percentage of .747). Looking at the two programs' historical winning percentages (Tennessee - .674; Georgia - .655) it's actually arguable that Georgia has overachieved since the year 2000.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News