Started By
Message
re: Who would you kick out of your division?
Posted on 4/18/20 at 10:05 am to momentoftruth87
Posted on 4/18/20 at 10:05 am to momentoftruth87
Texas A&M.
They just aren’t a SEC brand. Never will be.
They didn’t run to the SEC, they ran from UT.
The SEC used them and their insecurities towards UT to expand the conference footprint and viewership. It was a money grab by the SEC and not a best fit move. There is no southern alignment / chemistry with them at all. Many other schools would have brought a more southeastern flare to the conference but not the marketing footprint of southeast Texas.
They just aren’t a SEC brand. Never will be.
They didn’t run to the SEC, they ran from UT.
The SEC used them and their insecurities towards UT to expand the conference footprint and viewership. It was a money grab by the SEC and not a best fit move. There is no southern alignment / chemistry with them at all. Many other schools would have brought a more southeastern flare to the conference but not the marketing footprint of southeast Texas.
Posted on 4/18/20 at 10:12 am to SmashvilleTiger
quote:
The SEC used them and their insecurities towards UT to expand the conference footprint and viewership. It was a money grab by the SEC and not a best fit move. There is no southern alignment / chemistry with them at all. Many other schools would have brought a more southeastern flare to the conference but not the marketing footprint of southeast Texas.
What's so adorable is that they actually think they belong, and more so they actually think they are on the cusp of accomplishing something when they're literally one of 2 power conference teams that has never accomplished anything
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconrotflmao.gif)
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)