Started By
Message

re: Historical Elite Program Rankings

Posted on 1/15/20 at 4:24 pm to
Posted by BHMKyle
Birmingham, AL
Member since Feb 2013
5076 posts
Posted on 1/15/20 at 4:24 pm to
quote:

You could also have the qualifier of only at large bids count


Bingo. Yes, this is what I've been thinking.... or at least at-large bids count double the points compared to automatic qualifiers from one-bid mid-majors.

The problem: Who has time to go back through 70 years + of Tournament brackets to figure out who made it and whether they were an at-large, etc.? It would be a very time consuming project.
Posted by rockiee
Sugar Land, TX
Member since Jan 2015
28540 posts
Posted on 1/15/20 at 4:38 pm to
quote:

Who has time to go back through 70 years + of Tournament brackets to figure out who made it and whether they were an at-large, etc.?


Yeah, I mean that is the biggest issue and people will argue about that as well. Either way, Tournament wins should be the biggest factor. Scaling each win depending on where it takes place (ex. S16, E8 or F4) would be important as well. Good luck getting everyone to agree on the scaling though.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter