Started By
Message
re: Bad losses don’t matter to the CFP committee
Posted on 11/16/19 at 9:11 am to cyclingout
Posted on 11/16/19 at 9:11 am to cyclingout
No, I believe under this system, every game matters. It's exactly why Greg Sankey said the CFP committee doesn't want to expand beyond 4 teams. They want games like Bama-LSU to have major playoff implications...to be an elimination game if you will.
There are going to be multiple teams with one loss at the end of the year along with Bama vying for a spot, so yes, schedule and opponent records and most importantly wins all have to be considered.
Clemson has a creampuff schedule. But they've been doing what they should to those creampuffs and no one questions that if they win out they're in.
For my money, I let a one loss conference champ in over a one loss non-conference champ every day. Those championship games have to matter all the time, or never...not selectively in an effort to cherry pick which teams pass the "eye test" which is better known as: totally subjective bias.
There are going to be multiple teams with one loss at the end of the year along with Bama vying for a spot, so yes, schedule and opponent records and most importantly wins all have to be considered.
Clemson has a creampuff schedule. But they've been doing what they should to those creampuffs and no one questions that if they win out they're in.
For my money, I let a one loss conference champ in over a one loss non-conference champ every day. Those championship games have to matter all the time, or never...not selectively in an effort to cherry pick which teams pass the "eye test" which is better known as: totally subjective bias.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News