Started By
Message

re: Saban's comments on the defense post-South Carolina

Posted on 9/16/19 at 9:37 pm to
Posted by TidalSurge1
Ft Walton Beach
Member since Sep 2016
36467 posts
Posted on 9/16/19 at 9:37 pm to
quote:

quote:

Which of those teams a few years ago put 4-5 true freshman on the field with the first unit?

As said ad nauseum, they are in our back pocket because the risk of a bust outweighs the reward right now. We have to build some confidence in our inexperienced youth first. You've got to learn to walk before you can run.

As opposed to what? Watching a true freshman QB walk a Bama team into the red zone for 4 quarters. He might as well have been sitting in a Lincoln in that pocket, cause he sure looked comfortable. How do you make a true freshman QB with 5* talent think he's not the second coming of Joe Montana against mighty Bama?

Don't ask our DC, he doesn't have a clue.

Saban made is clear why he wanted to keep things simple (vanilla) for the front-7 vs SC and it's been re-explained to you quite well by others itt. It's a temporary measure that was taken for that game and more stunts, blitzes, etc. will be implemented going forward. But you still don't seem to get that.

It seems to me that our DC and Saban actually do have a clue. Maybe you can't admit you've overracted. Try exercising some patience for the next few games while our new young front-7 players are learning on the job.

Everything Saban said in 1st press conference of Southern Miss week (BamaOnLine)



Note: Includes full transcript and video.
This post was edited on 9/16/19 at 11:46 pm
Posted by Bear88
Member since Oct 2014
13357 posts
Posted on 9/17/19 at 5:55 am to
After giving up 31 first downs to a team that got 15 and 153 total yds vs UNC, I hope we don’t try too many more vanilla approaches
Posted by bamameister
Right here, right now
Member since May 2016
14638 posts
Posted on 9/17/19 at 7:14 am to
quote:

Saban made is clear why he wanted to keep things simple (vanilla) for the front-7 vs SC and it's been re-explained to you quite well by others itt. It's a temporary measure that was taken for that game and more stunts, blitzes, etc. will be implemented going forward. But you still don't seem to get that.


What I don't get, at this point, is your comfort zone for our defensive sample size. This isn't just a 3 game issue, this is an 18 game issue now. Last season we tried to put it under poor comminication between Mack Wilson and our DCs, whoever they happened to be at the time. That would be the same Mack Wilson starting for the Cleveland Browns last night as a rookie and he didn't look lost or exposed. The middle of our defense was being exposed and teams were walking the ball down our throat, who couldn't even get that stuff done against lesser defenses on their schedule? Arkansas, for example. How did all those spread teams continue to expose the middle of our defense with Dylan Moses, Mack Wilson and we also had the 3rd pick in the draft, Q-man, sitting there at NT making All-American. SC was watching the same tapes, obviously.

Something is amiss. And we've been watching something against these HUNH RPO teams the last 2 seasons now that has reached the point of astonishment to me as a lifelong Bama fan back to coach Bryant.

These failures are looking like scheme issues against teams who have much less talent. If a Muschamp offense can pick up where Clemson left off, with, ironically, another TF QB, we will see plenty more where this came from. Unfortunately.

quote:


It seems to me that our DC and Saban actually do have a clue. Maybe you can't admit you've overracted. Try exercising some patience for the next few games while our new young front-7 players are learning on the job.


The next HUNH RPO team that Golding checks down will be the first. I suggest we all break out the popcorn.




first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter