Started By
Message
re: which "former glory" SEC team is least likely to ever be relevant again?
Posted on 5/8/19 at 3:15 pm to Korin
Posted on 5/8/19 at 3:15 pm to Korin
quote:
Not all of those are polls. The majority are mathematical formula ranking developed by individuals.
They are referred to as polls in CFB. The BCS is a mathematical formula, but referred to as a poll
2
Posted on 5/8/19 at 3:59 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
They are referred to as polls in CFB.
Not in the actual records book you linked. Hit up page 108.
Posted on 5/8/19 at 6:34 pm to NYCAuburn
The more reasonable list is that one from ncaa.com that I linked before ncaa.com
It lists 15 for Alabama, rather than the 22 in the other. It lists 2 for UT and Auburn.
Personally, I'm good with just listing titles since 1936, when the legitimate news polls cranked up.
It lists 15 for Alabama, rather than the 22 in the other. It lists 2 for UT and Auburn.
Personally, I'm good with just listing titles since 1936, when the legitimate news polls cranked up.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News