Started By
Message
re: Gamecock Board March Madness Thread
Posted on 3/11/19 at 6:16 pm to 1801
Posted on 3/11/19 at 6:16 pm to 1801
I understand they beat us but Baylor’s been an NCAAT team “regular” outside of last year.
And yea it’s mostlt the “wtf” of the Net. But apparently defensive and offensive efficiency are also factored in that.
Where do they stand compared to us?
And yea it’s mostlt the “wtf” of the Net. But apparently defensive and offensive efficiency are also factored in that.
Where do they stand compared to us?
1
Posted on 3/11/19 at 6:51 pm to I Bleed Garnet
I've just been following the team sheets put out by the NCAA website. not sure what the off/def efficiency ratings are. I'm guessing they're among some of these ratings from the team sheets?
BAY (KPI 35, SOR 36) (BPI 40, POM 35, SAG 38) Avg NET win 118 / Avg NET loss 78
USC (KPI 80, SOR 68) (BPI 78, POM 73, SAG 70) Avg NET win 122 / Avg NET loss 59
BAY Strength of Sched "Div I only" 38 / "Div I Non-conf" 155
USC Strength of Sched "Div I only" 37 / "Div I Non-conf" 83
I have no issue with USC not getting an at-large NCAAT bid without an SECT CG appearance, I just don't trust all these calculations and their overall lack of transparency to treat everyone equal. I can accept Baylor has been awarded more Q1/Q2 wins with this system, I just can't believe their ranking to be 42 spots higher than USC while having more Q3/Q4 losses than the Gamecocks.
Texas is 16-15 overall and has a 39 NET. Indiana is 17-14 and sits at 51 NET. 15-15 Gamecocks (per the NET) at 78.
BAY (KPI 35, SOR 36) (BPI 40, POM 35, SAG 38) Avg NET win 118 / Avg NET loss 78
USC (KPI 80, SOR 68) (BPI 78, POM 73, SAG 70) Avg NET win 122 / Avg NET loss 59
BAY Strength of Sched "Div I only" 38 / "Div I Non-conf" 155
USC Strength of Sched "Div I only" 37 / "Div I Non-conf" 83
I have no issue with USC not getting an at-large NCAAT bid without an SECT CG appearance, I just don't trust all these calculations and their overall lack of transparency to treat everyone equal. I can accept Baylor has been awarded more Q1/Q2 wins with this system, I just can't believe their ranking to be 42 spots higher than USC while having more Q3/Q4 losses than the Gamecocks.
Texas is 16-15 overall and has a 39 NET. Indiana is 17-14 and sits at 51 NET. 15-15 Gamecocks (per the NET) at 78.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News