Started By
Message
re: NCAA to review transfer guidelines
Posted on 2/14/19 at 2:57 pm to Team 122
Posted on 2/14/19 at 2:57 pm to Team 122
This is by no means sour grapes because it would have been tough for me as a football player at Ole Miss to stay. However, this whole "transfer waiver" BS really took off when the NCAA allowed immediate eligibility for the players who left Ole Miss.
Posted on 2/14/19 at 3:00 pm to Freezus22
I thought this would happen, hard to put pandora back in the box now. How did they not see this coming? I thought this is what they wanted.
Posted on 2/14/19 at 3:04 pm to Freezus22
quote:
This is by no means sour grapes because it would have been tough for me as a football player at Ole Miss to stay. However, this whole "transfer waiver" BS really took off when the NCAA allowed immediate eligibility for the players who left Ole Miss.
They’ve allowed immediate eligibility to any player at an institution that is on probation and bowl ban long before the Ole Miss case. It’s just more accepting to transfer these days.
Alabama had the “hold the rope” thing with its 2002 case. All players stayed. Doubt that could happen now.
This post was edited on 2/14/19 at 3:06 pm
Posted on 2/14/19 at 3:05 pm to Freezus22
quote:
However, this whole "transfer waiver" BS really took off when the NCAA allowed immediate eligibility for the players who left Ole Miss.
Maybe you guys shouldn’t have misled recruits about the investigation
Posted on 2/14/19 at 3:07 pm to Freezus22
quote:
This is by no means sour grapes because it would have been tough for me as a football player at Ole Miss to stay. However, this whole "transfer waiver" BS really took off when the NCAA allowed immediate eligibility for the players who left Ole Miss.
Not it didn't, there's special cases like that every time, for instance PSU after pedo-gate.
The recent rash of approved transfers outside of that had nothing to do with Ole Miss.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)