Started By
Message

re: 82 bowl teams tested for drugs. To my knowledge only 2 teams had players suspended for Ped

Posted on 1/15/19 at 7:52 am to
Posted by stat19
Member since Feb 2011
29350 posts
Posted on 1/15/19 at 7:52 am to
quote:

That tells you everything you need to know.


I would probably agree with you had more on those two teams tested positive. Based on the results, testing positive was the outlier, not the norm.

quote:

Kat Kat

On the other hand, I notice you choose to not identify as the fan of any particular team. I guess that's because you'd be raked over the coals about your teams history of testing positive.

Try a different troll, genius.
Posted by Che Boludo
Member since May 2009
18288 posts
Posted on 1/15/19 at 8:05 am to
quote:

I would probably agree with you had more on those two teams tested positive. Based on the results, testing positive was the outlier, not the norm.

Given it was random testing and not 100% and that steroid testing in the NCAA has historically had less than 1 % (2012 report) of all players tested test positive, I'd argue 3 on one team is the outlier.

Should have raised more eyebrows for Clemson strength and conditioning.

There is no confirmation if it was street drugs or PEDs for Bama players, but all seems to indicate street drugs.
This post was edited on 1/15/19 at 8:16 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter