Started By
Message

re: If Fields is ruled eligible...

Posted on 1/4/19 at 10:57 pm to
Posted by Shaft Williams
Central City, LA
Member since Jul 2010
9474 posts
Posted on 1/4/19 at 10:57 pm to
quote:

He had plays to run, ...and you are looking at this in reverse. You are assuming he was a victim instead of he just wasn’t developed enough yet or possibly not capable or qualified to run the entire playbook, what proof do u have he even understood it....none. It’s the same argument unqualified people have that they weren’t hired for a job, “they were screwed over” instead of facing the reality that they weren’t qualified....no more No less than they simply weren’t skilled or qualified enough. What proof do u have that he was even capable of running the full offense or all the packages. There is no proof, in almost 100% of the situations like this the reason they aren’t running the full offense is they aren’t capable yet, also in blow outs you are not going to keep running your offense full tilt, he was in those games to get him game time and to keep the actual starter healthy, learn the game, it will help u grasp concepts like this. He was put in games to keep him and his dad happy.


If you're right why put him in any damn game?! What was the point of putting Fields in games negating a year of his eligibility?
Posted by Shaft Williams
Central City, LA
Member since Jul 2010
9474 posts
Posted on 1/4/19 at 10:59 pm to
See if you say Fields didn't know the plays, couldn't read defenses, etc. it's going to come back to why was the coaching staff burning a year of his eligibility. Fields really could have rode the pine the entire season for what UGA used him for.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter