Started By
Message
re: How about this Auburn controversy
Posted on 10/29/18 at 9:24 am to pvilleguru
Posted on 10/29/18 at 9:24 am to pvilleguru
quote:
Not if more than half of the constituency agrees with it. The problem is that they are supposed to represent everyone in their district/state/etc., not just those that voted for them.
Your argument was they would be affected how to vote and therefore would not be representing their constituency. if their constituency agrees with their vote, then they would be representing them, would they not?
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/icons/shrug.gif)
quote:
The problem is that they are supposed to represent everyone in their district/state/etc., not just those that voted for them.
If their constituency differs on an issue there is no way they can represent all of their constituency. If they do not vote according to the majority of their constituency, then they can be voted out.
Posted on 10/29/18 at 9:26 am to DawgsLife
quote:
If their constituency differs on an issue there is no way they can represent all of their constituency. If they do not vote according to the majority of their constituency, then they can be voted out.
If only we had a solution to this...
Oh, what if we kept religion out of politics?
Posted on 10/29/18 at 9:28 am to DawgsLife
Aaaaand this is how there was marriage inequality until very recently.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)