Started By
Message

re: Brandon Kennedy transferring

Posted on 5/16/18 at 1:36 am to
Posted by TidalSurge1
Ft Walton Beach
Member since Sep 2016
36467 posts
Posted on 5/16/18 at 1:36 am to
I'm pretty sure the NCAA requires that schools' NLI agreements obligate the school to provide a scholarship for a minimumum of 4 years, and maybe even a 5th year too if they're redshirted.

The school spends one of their 25 annual Initial Counter spots and 85 total scholarship spots to get a 4-5 year player, and then invests extensively in educating, supporting and developing them.

The SEC has a policy against student athletes transfering to other schools within the conference. It's also my understanding that schools' typically include their standard transfer release restrictions in their NLI agreements, meaning the student athletes have already agreed to those on day one.

The SEC policy also provides that a student athlete may appeal to the SEC to override transfer release restriction(s) that a school is unwilling to waive.

The purpose of the restrictions is to protect the school (and its other members) against the adverse impact of players transfering to schools that compete directly against them in their conference or on their schedule. A student athlete getting an undergrad degree early does not invalidate the transfer release restrictions that were agreed to in the NLI.

What I've described is pretty standard across FBS conferences and schools.

NCAA Bylaws (rules) contain a grad transfer provision that allows for a transfer release restriction to be overridden if the school does not offer the grad degree that the student desires to pursue.

It's my understanding that Kennedy got his undergrad degree in 3 years, redshirted his freshman year and also got a medical redshirt for 2017, and thus has 3 years of eligibilty remaining.

He's also already taken grad courses at UA, so it's apparently not a case of him needing to transfer to UT or AU in order to pursue a grad degree UA doesn't offer.

Instead, it smells like a case of tampering by UT and/or AU with a valuable UA player, enticing him to transfer by promising him he'll be their starting center for the 2018 season.

Reportedly, Kennedy wants to transfer to UT. Kennedy has appealed to have the restriction overridden by the SEC. UT is of course hoping media and public sentiment will win the day like it did with Mo Smith leaving UA for UGA.

One thing that worked in Smith's favor was that UGA and UA were not scheduled to play each other. That's not the case with Kennedy seeking to go to UT.

There's a significant number of players who get their undergrad degrees in three years. If the SEC overrides the restriction and allows Kennedy to transfer (after only being at UA for 3 years) to UT, simply because he got his undergrad degree early, they're setting a dangerous precedent.
This post was edited on 5/16/18 at 11:32 am
Posted by Carlton
I hate Goth Brook's Twitter
Member since Feb 2016
13076 posts
Posted on 5/16/18 at 10:15 am to
quote:

There's a significant number of players who get their undergrad degrees in three years. If the SEC overrides the restriction and allows Kennedy to transfer to UT, simply because he has his undergrad degree, they're setting a dangerous precedent.


I disagree with this. The link below talks about the misconception of changing the transfer rules and how it will impact college football. I can agree that the number of grad transfers is growing fast but there is a bubble coming.


LINK

There was only 117 grad transfers in 2016 and although it is a huge jump from 2011 that growth it is unlikely to sustain itself. I would like to see the current numbers for qualifying for graduate transfer in 3 or 3 1/2 years. I'm not sure how many on the football team do, but it would have to be significantly above the general population under 4 year graduation rate to be significant.

With that being said most grads choose to go back to the same school for a grad degree, go to another P5 conference or go Group of 6/Division II/III. I doubt you are going to see and influx of grads jumping to conference rivals.

As far as the contract piece goes it looks as though everyone is fullfilling the contract, Alabama blocked his options and he can appeal if he so chooses.
No big deal, but I think the SEC should change the restrictions. I think the impact it has on schools is greatly exagerrated and it is better for the students.
This post was edited on 5/16/18 at 10:20 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter