Started By
Message
re: The changing of the Blue-Bloods
Posted on 4/18/18 at 2:14 pm to lsupride87
Posted on 4/18/18 at 2:14 pm to lsupride87
quote:
I beleive all time LSU/UGA/Tenn are very close
I think UF and AU are just below those 3. But clearly below
I can see that. AU is only in there because of 2010. UF has had ridiculous success since 1990 but not much before, but that success still can't be understated.
And I believe all of the aforementioned are still behind UT, really goes to show how excellent they were their entire history prior to 2009.
1
Posted on 4/18/18 at 2:17 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:I would agree, which is why I think judging teams as a program based on 60-100 years ago seems strange
And I believe all of the aforementioned are still behind UT, really goes to show how excellent they were their entire history prior to 2009.
I definitely would rank Tenn #1 out of Tenn/UGA/UF/AU/LSU in terms of ALL time, but I would rank them last in my lifetime, and I am 30......
So at what point to I say they are actually the worst program instead of the best to those that hang on to the term blue blood?
This post was edited on 4/18/18 at 2:18 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News