Started By
Message
re: The changing of the Blue-Bloods
Posted on 4/18/18 at 11:41 am to RD Dawg
Posted on 4/18/18 at 11:41 am to RD Dawg
quote:
Complate garbage.So if Miami goes on to win 4 NC's in the next 15 years and has a total of 9,they won't be
a "blue blood"?
No and the culture at the U will never be one that goes along with a blue blood program.
When we say blue blood, think "royalty". Won't mean they don't already even have a great program. They're just not royalty when it comes to college football. Sounds snobbish but that's just the way it is.
I like Miami but let's be honest, they're trashy.
Georgia and Tennessee at their very best have always been Alabama-lite.
You can't just be a powerhouse from back then, you also have to have some modern credentials. As such, those Northeast teams you mentioned, don't qualify. They are fine universities but just not blueblood football programs.
2
Posted on 4/18/18 at 11:57 am to ColoBama
quote:
No and the culture at the U will never be one that goes along with a blue blood program.
What "culture" is that???And now the "culture"is part of the equation along pre WWII records? Who the Hell pUT you in charge of this formula?
quote:
They're just not royalty when it comes to college football.
So are Pitt and Minnesota "royalty" if they have modern success???
quote:
Miami but let's be honest, they're trashy.
And Bama wasn't trashy under the Dubose and Logan
Young ?
Don't care if a team is "trashy"or not,if they have 9
NC's they're blue bloods period.
This post was edited on 4/18/18 at 12:06 pm
Posted on 4/18/18 at 11:58 am to ColoBama
quote:
I like Miami but let's be honest, they're trashy.
ah the irony...
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News