Started By
Message

Old BCS Sucked

Posted on 12/4/17 at 8:46 am
Posted by allin2010
Auburn
Member since Aug 2011
18159 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 8:46 am
UGA would be out, it would be Clemson vs. Oklahoma in. UGA deserves a shot. The 4 team playoff ensures that. It will be won or loss on the field, not in a board room. If Bama is good enough and wins it, then they deserve it.
Posted by CaptainBrannigan
Good Ole Rocky Top Tennessee
Member since Jan 2010
21644 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 8:48 am to
If take the playoff using the shitty BCS over this committee full of dumbasses any day.
Posted by Glory, Glory
Pawleys Island, SC
Member since Nov 2012
4498 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 8:53 am to
Posted by pvilleguru
Member since Jun 2009
60453 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 8:57 am to
It only sucked because it was limited to 2 teams.
Posted by stat19
Member since Feb 2011
29350 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 9:02 am to
quote:

UGA would be out, it would be Clemson vs. Oklahoma in


I disagree. The AP excluded itself from the BCS following the 2004 rankings.

The Coaches poll is the only poll that favored OK over UGA
Posted by Festus
With Skillet
Member since Nov 2009
85063 posts
Posted on 12/4/17 at 9:04 am to
It really didn't change much of anything, except it moved the bar. Instead of the bitching starting at #3 being left out, it starts at #5. If they moved it to an 8 team, the bitching would start at #9.

Bottom line, no matter where you draw the line, there's always an argument that the next team in the line was "left out", because there will always be very little separation between the last 2-4.

In your scenario, OSU this year, is your UGA in the old BCS format.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter