Started By
Message

re: Maybe we shouldn’t leave Jerry Dinson in coverage 1-on-1...

Posted on 11/30/17 at 8:55 am to
Posted by joeyb147
Member since Jun 2009
16019 posts
Posted on 11/30/17 at 8:55 am to
quote:

Why are we that bad in coverage then?
... but we aren't bad in coverage?

53.9% completion percentage (3rd in SEC)
5.7 yards/att (2nd in SEC)
109.5 rating (4th in SEC)


12 TDs (4th in SEC)
177 ypg (5th in SEC)

While facing 371 attempts which is 11th in the SEC

Which means...
65 attempts/TD (1st in SEC)
Posted by Tigerman97
Member since Jun 2014
10354 posts
Posted on 11/30/17 at 10:33 am to
quote:

... but we aren't bad in coverage?

53.9% completion percentage (3rd in SEC)
5.7 yards/att (2nd in SEC)
109.5 rating (4th in SEC)


12 TDs (4th in SEC)
177 ypg (5th in SEC)

While facing 371 attempts which is 11th in the SEC

Which means...
65 attempts/TD (1st in SEC)


Thanks for compiling this...football is a game best experienced without emotion. There is nothing about our D to this point that would lead anyone to believe we aren't elite on that side of the ball. Can a guy have a bad play or the D have a bad game? Yes. We are great at all 3 levels this year. Covering the WR's these guys have to cover isn't a simple task.
Posted by Scrimpin Gary
ATX
Member since Feb 2013
1073 posts
Posted on 11/30/17 at 12:11 pm to
I stand corrected then guys. Thanks for the responses.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter