Started By
Message

re: Harrick Scandal in hindsight

Posted on 10/13/17 at 11:50 am to
Posted by fibonaccisquared
The mystical waters of the Hooch
Member since Dec 2011
16898 posts
Posted on 10/13/17 at 11:50 am to
quote:

THe difference is basically that the basketball program itself was responsible for and knew about the fake class that Harrick Jr. (an assistant coach) ran.


But the class was available for other students to take clearly. Based on the comments from the NCAA, the reason they are unable to penalize UNC has nothing to do with athletic program involvement, but rather that the benefit was not something that was exclusive to the student athletes.





So long as the university determines that it's not improper academic benefits, apparently the NCAA is incapable of passing judgement on it...
Posted by GurleyGirl
Georgia
Member since Nov 2015
13333 posts
Posted on 10/13/17 at 12:08 pm to
So it's OK to offer crib courses that are available to all students that student athletes can flock to.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter