Started By
Message
re: Harrick Scandal in hindsight
Posted on 10/13/17 at 11:39 am to fibonaccisquared
Posted on 10/13/17 at 11:39 am to fibonaccisquared
THe difference is basically that the basketball program itself was responsible for and knew about the fake class that Harrick Jr. (an assistant coach) ran.
In UNCs case, thins was an academic scandal that apparently the basketball program had no part in, or at least nothing the NCAA found.
In UNCs case, thins was an academic scandal that apparently the basketball program had no part in, or at least nothing the NCAA found.
1
Posted on 10/13/17 at 11:50 am to rockchlkjayhku11
quote:
THe difference is basically that the basketball program itself was responsible for and knew about the fake class that Harrick Jr. (an assistant coach) ran.
But the class was available for other students to take clearly. Based on the comments from the NCAA, the reason they are unable to penalize UNC has nothing to do with athletic program involvement, but rather that the benefit was not something that was exclusive to the student athletes.
So long as the university determines that it's not improper academic benefits, apparently the NCAA is incapable of passing judgement on it...
Page 1 of 1
Latest Georgia News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News