Started By
Message

re: NY Times: Nick Saban Broke LSU

Posted on 10/5/17 at 2:30 pm to
Posted by CBandits82
Lurker since May 2008
Member since May 2012
54182 posts
Posted on 10/5/17 at 2:30 pm to
Before Saban got there LSU was irrelevant contrary to what LSU fans will say on here

We won National a title and SEC titles.

What does this mean?
Posted by tattoo
Fantasy Island
Member since Oct 2017
1806 posts
Posted on 10/5/17 at 2:53 pm to
I'm a Bama fan and I can't believe that some keep saying that LSU was irrelevant before Saban. The period just prior, they were, but not long term. I've said elsewhere that they can make an argument for being the 2nd best SEC program historically. Without question they are top 4 with Bama, UT, UGA. IMO, at least number 3. LSU is probably number 9 or 10 nationally, not an elite program historically, but just below. Assuming they can get some decent University leadership, they will be back.

Every program goes through down times, even the elite. It's usually because of executive and/or administrative leadership: BOT, President, AD. Bama presidents were critically instrumental: George Denny - the concept of football being highly significant to a university, Wade, Thomas; Frank Rose - Bryant; Robert Witt - almost Denny again, Saban.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter