quote:
Who has been sacked a few times by NONE ELITE talent at sub par schools in this new offense you are beginning to brag about.

I'm speaking numbers and facts and you are speaking in mythical terms.

Numbers and facts lol. OK. SO what are you saying then? MSU is going to sack us 10 times or some shite? We have a young Oline. No one said we didn't.

YOU are the one bragging you guys haven't given up one yet playing sisters of the poor. I mean sure, dont be concerned about our front 7 or anything.

quote:
Who stated anything different? So let's talk about why his average per carry is down over 2.5 yards per carry against NON ELITE talent at sub par schools?

I am not sure what point you are trying to make. Guice is the same Guice. We pulled him after the 1st series in the 3rd last night. He could of had 250+ if we wanted. Isn't that your excuse for giving up all those rushing yards to La Tech? You put in backups?

Guice is a PROVEN SEC back. Use whatever numbers you want to make you feel better.

quote:
Who, by evidence, is allowing sacks and less yards per carry to non elite talent at sub par schools.

By NFL scouts... Period.

quote:
That's awesome sauce! Now explain the match ups that result in LSU stopping a massive running QB who now has 2 extra threats that they didn't have last year..... TEs and bigger RBs.

I dont know, go watch what our guys returning did to the Heisman winner who is a BETTER RUNNER...

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by MButterfly

Quantico

Member since Oct 2015

6860 posts

Posted on 9/10/17 at 12:28 pm to JayDeerTay84

quote:
Numbers and facts lol. OK. SO what are you saying then?

They will get after your QB. If you are allowing lesser talent, then you should expect MSU to do a bit more.

quote:
YOU are the one bragging you guys haven't given up one yet playing sisters of the poor. I mean sure, dont be concerned about our front 7 or anything.

No, that's a 2 way street. It's reasonable to think LSU will get to the QB. But MSU is better designed to handle that. Their reads and now TEs gives them an out.

That's the point. Sometimes it's not just about the talent, it's the schemes.

quote:
I am not sure what point you are trying to make. Guice is the same Guice. We pulled him after the 1st series in the 3rd last night. He could of had 250+ if we wanted. Isn't that your excuse for giving up all those rushing yards to La Tech? You put in backups?

I'm talking average yards per carry, and you equate that to total rushing yards. LOL

I don't have and excuse for them putting in their 3 and 4th string defensive players. I have facts. That's all I am talking about.

The facts with that are way different with the facts of yards per carry.

Fact, MSU will not put in 3rd and 4th string guys. WE both know that. Would that not mean we look at what the first and second string guys did? Sure it does. The fact is their defense starters and subs got what they got while in.

Fact, Guice got what he got while in the game. It has an average yard per carry.

In other words, we can push aside everything except what the starters did and compare.

quote:
Guice is a PROVEN SEC back. Use whatever numbers you want to make you feel better.

True.... but the last time I viewed a game, a RB production was contingent on more than just his ability. Direct snap to him and tell the center to not block and I assure you it will be PROVEN he can't run.

Using your logic, he should still be averaging 7.8 yards per carry. He's not. So he is no longer as PROVEN?