Started By
Message
re: I spent the last 4 hours or so listening ( rosebowl was right!)
Posted on 8/19/17 at 6:59 pm to VivaZapata27
Posted on 8/19/17 at 6:59 pm to VivaZapata27
quote:
If you doubt Godfrey's credibility just read the NOA. It's in there.
Can you point to the specific portion? I mean you did make the allegation so I assume you know where it is
Posted on 8/19/17 at 7:03 pm to StopRobot
I've read it with my own eyeballs. If you're that interested then you should do the same. I'm not about to scan that long arse document again just because you are a skeptic. I didn't make the allegation, Lewis did.
Posted on 8/19/17 at 7:10 pm to VivaZapata27
quote:
Yeah.
LINK
Its 117 pages. Ill be happy to search it. What search term should I use?
Posted on 8/19/17 at 7:13 pm to VivaZapata27
quote:
I've read it with my own eyeballs. If you're that interested then you should do the same. I'm not about to scan that long arse document again just because you are a skeptic. I didn't make the allegation, Lewis did.
Oh you dont need to scan it. I will be happy to search it myself even though I didnt make the allegation. What search term should I use?
Posted on 8/19/17 at 7:14 pm to VivaZapata27
quote:
Read it all.
You made the allegation not me. Generally the person making a statement of fact feels compelled to prove it.
Posted on 8/19/17 at 7:25 pm to StopRobot
I've given you proof with two links with credible sourcing. Do with it what you wish.
Posted on 8/19/17 at 7:38 pm to VivaZapata27
quote:
I've given you proof with two links with credible sourcing. Do with it what you wish.
You said Lewis admitted to being paid by another SEC school. You have given no proof of this.
Posted on 8/19/17 at 7:47 pm to StopRobot
Are you retarded or just dense?
Posted on 8/19/17 at 8:01 pm to VivaZapata27
quote:
I've given you proof with two links with credible sourcing. Do with it what you wish.
No you haven't.
Lewis is allegation 16. In the rebuttal there is no mention at all of him saying he got money from another institution. He says his plan was to get paid by OM but sign with a different institution which we know to be state. From page 85:
quote:
reported that he never called to discuss a domestic issue and his telephone records show no calls to during this time period. 410 also reported that he received this text message and multiple phone calls from approximately an hour or two after receiving the $10,000 from but never replied or answered. 411 explained that the text message concerned their meeting in BMW that day and asked for him to promise on his daughter's life he would sign with the institution. 412 also indicated his intention at the time was to obtain the $10,000 from and then sign with another institution. 413 Farrar texted another individual at 6:44 p.m. February 3 "[s]ounds like went south to me on which shows his awareness that would be signing elsewhere. 414 The enforcement staff asserts that the message clearly shows referencing his meeting with that day and belief they had arranged terms securing commitment to the institution. The message also shows expressing surprise and dismay in reading online that was flirting with other schools and he likely had wasted $10,000.
Posted on 8/19/17 at 8:04 pm to VivaZapata27
quote:
Are you retarded or just dense?
Why is this so hard? You said Lewis admitted to being paid by another SEC school. All you have to do is quote him doing that. This should be so simple. Why isnt it?
Posted on 8/19/17 at 8:08 pm to StopRobot
All I can do is quote second hand sources genius. I wasn't there when he said it. But both credible sources I gave you stated it. You choose not to believe one and not to read the other. That's on you. You don't have to believe shite and I dgaf either way. Dude asked for links and he got them.
Posted on 8/19/17 at 8:18 pm to VivaZapata27
So you're ignoring actual evidence - including a document you linked - in favor of believing OM writers who have been right about absolutely nothing thus far.
That's a great way to get badly disappointed. I know. I did it as a Bama fan during the DuBose saga.
If there were a suggestion of payments from other sources, it would be incredibly important in assessing his credibility and would have been in both OM's reply and addressed in the NCAA rebuttal.
Just like the phantom recording, it isn't mentioned in either place thus it is a rock solid lock that it doesn't exist.
That's a great way to get badly disappointed. I know. I did it as a Bama fan during the DuBose saga.
If there were a suggestion of payments from other sources, it would be incredibly important in assessing his credibility and would have been in both OM's reply and addressed in the NCAA rebuttal.
Just like the phantom recording, it isn't mentioned in either place thus it is a rock solid lock that it doesn't exist.
Posted on 8/19/17 at 8:25 pm to VivaZapata27
quote:
All I can do is quote second hand sources genius. I wasn't there when he said it. But both credible sources I gave you stated it. You choose not to believe one and not to read the other. That's on you. You don't have to believe shite and I dgaf either way. Dude asked for links and he got them.
You made the allegation sir. Can you quote Lewis saying he was paid by another SEC school or not? If you cant then thats fine, just admit you were misinformed. You wouldnt be the first.
Posted on 8/19/17 at 8:29 pm to VivaZapata27
quote:
I spent the last 4 hours or so listening ( rosebowl was right!) by VivaZapata27
I've read it with my own eyeballs. If you're that interested then you should do the same. I'm not about to scan that long arse document again just because you are a skeptic. I didn't make the allegation, Lewis did.
It's nowhere in the actual document
Posted on 8/19/17 at 8:55 pm to SouthOfHere
[link=( In his first two interviews, the enforcement staff did not ask [Student-Athlete 39] any questions inconsistent with the narrative of University misconduct, even after University requests to explore alternative theories and sources (comments from [Student-Athlete 39] and his counsel made clear that [Student-Athlete 39] had similar violations unrelated to the University). In response to that question in his third interview, [Student-Athlete 39] admitted his receipt of an identical $10,000 payment at about the same time from another institution. 74)]Referenced the actual transcript of Lewis' testimony, which isn't public record yet. [/link]
Best I can do for you curious souls. Whether you believe it or not is up to you. I'm not pulling it out of my arse. It's there in black and white in a national news article and in the NOA/response. Quit being vaginas.
Best I can do for you curious souls. Whether you believe it or not is up to you. I'm not pulling it out of my arse. It's there in black and white in a national news article and in the NOA/response. Quit being vaginas.
Posted on 8/19/17 at 8:55 pm to VivaZapata27
quote:
In his first two interviews, the enforcement staff did not ask [Student-Athlete 39] any questions inconsistent with the narrative of University misconduct, even after University requests to explore alternative theories and sources (comments from [Student-Athlete 39] and his counsel made clear that [Student-Athlete 39] had similar violations unrelated to the University). In response to that question in his third interview, [Student-Athlete 39] admitted his receipt of an identical $10,000 payment at about the same time from another institution. 74
Posted on 8/19/17 at 10:35 pm to StopRobot
Where did he go on his official visits?
Posted on 8/19/17 at 11:32 pm to VivaZapata27
quote:This exonerates Ole Miss?
Perhaps, but he was clearly paid by multiple schools, per him.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News