Started By
Message
re: WSJ: Hugh Freeze’s Ouster at Ole Miss Linked to Multiple Recruiting Trips
Posted on 8/17/17 at 11:00 am to Vecchio Cane
Posted on 8/17/17 at 11:00 am to Vecchio Cane
quote:it's for the recruits. the proof is how FAST they decided it was all CHF and how CHF walked away from 16,000,000 bucks. IT WAS FOR RECRUITS. Duh. If not, why not make sure of that before claiming it was all freezus? They didnt have to look into it b/c they already knew what the lie had to be. And explains why they stood by him so long in the first place w/ all the NCAA trouble. B/c he has the goods on them.
This is the reason all the rebs are singing the "escorts were definitely only for Hugh and absolutely not for any recruits" tune. Spirit Chuck had them in lockstep 10 minutes after the story broke a few weeks ago
Which is another reason I'm skeptical. Not one person who claims that the hookers were only for Hugh's personal use has been correct about a single thing in this whole deal. The law of averages says they should get this right, but I won't believe it until I see it
This post was edited on 8/17/17 at 11:01 am
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)