re: Here is the unredacted NOA

quote:

---

Nutt's attorneys can subpoena them and business records would be my first guess

---

Not sure what relevance booster actions would have to Nutt's claim, other than as listed in the NOA. His claim is against Ole Miss, the IHL, and the Foundation, not against the boosters. The listing of violations under Freeze and details as charged in the NOA and how the contents of the NOA were represented to the public and press is what matters. Nutt doesn't have to prove the truth of the charges in the NOA, only that Ole Miss disparaged him in its portrayal of Nutt as the person responsible for the bulk of the charges. Subpoenaing records from boosters would be unlikely to produce relevant evidence. And as the boosters are not parties, I'm not even sure he could subpoena their records. I doubt a court would allow such a fishing expedition.