Started By
Message

re: Here is the unredacted NOA

Posted on 7/28/17 at 4:45 pm to
Posted by Whereisomaha
Member since Feb 2010
17939 posts
Posted on 7/28/17 at 4:45 pm to
quote:

by having a potential recruit alone at a hunting camp with a booster? Yeah, nothing bad could possibly come from that.

That wasn't the case. Dunlap has land close to Oxford that he lets players hunt on, one of those was Ben Still, OM's center, who was Golson's player host. Ben asked if Golson wanted to hunt while he was in town, so that's where they went. If what you mentioned was the case it wouldn't be a charge of letting someone on your land, but a charge of improper contact with a recruit. And given this information is known from snitching, the ncaa has all the info.
Posted by EKG
Houston, TX
Member since Jun 2010
44176 posts
Posted on 7/28/17 at 4:55 pm to
quote:

Dunlap has land close to Oxford that he lets players hunt on

That right there is a violation.
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
65530 posts
Posted on 7/28/17 at 5:04 pm to
quote:

If what you mentioned was the case it wouldn't be a charge of letting someone on your land, but a charge of improper contact with a recruit. And given this information is known from snitching, the ncaa has all the info.

so Ole Miss answered by admitting to additional violations? All the NCAA did was say they let a recruit on a boosters hunting land once during his recruitment and 2-3 times more after enrolled. So Ole Miss admitted this was a regularly occurring event with multiple players? Or are you just making all of this up?

I'm trying tp figure out when y'all will stop buying what your message boards are selling
This post was edited on 7/28/17 at 5:05 pm
Posted by TonyMontana
Member since Jul 2017
1169 posts
Posted on 7/28/17 at 10:12 pm to
The point isnt the hunting on the land. The point is showing a pattern of willfully breaking rules over the course of 3 sports, multiple administrations, multiple football staffs, how involved so many different boosters (14) were, how purposeful it was that said boosters were involved, and how many student athletes were involved (49). In other words, Lack of Institutional Control and Failure to monitor.
The NOAs never sound that bad, because all the NCAA includes is what they know they can prove. There are always more items that they are 99% sure happened, but they cant prove it so they leave them out. In this case, there are 21 allegations, each with multiple infractions, for a total of damn near 100 infractions THAT THEY CAN PROVE. So the "aw shucks, that aint so bad" aint gonna fly here. And this is all before they tie the hookers to recruits.
This post was edited on 7/28/17 at 10:17 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter