Started By
Message

re: Big 6 question regarding Auburn

Posted on 6/22/17 at 9:23 pm to
Posted by cajunbama
Metairie
Member since Jan 2007
30949 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 9:23 pm to
In probation stained 1993 you couldn't play in the SECCG or even on TV.


In 1983 Texas beat AU like a drum in what was the biggest game ever played in Auburn up to that time. Texas was more deserving than Auburn.
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 9:24 pm to
quote:

The team capped a stellar 11–1 season, with a 9-7 victory over Michigan in the Sugar Bowl. Despite entering the bowl games ranked third in both major polls, and with both teams ranked higher losing their bowl games, the Tigers ended ranked third in the final AP and the UPI Coaches' poll as Miami jumped from 5th from the AP and 4th from the UPI Coaches' poll to claim the AP/UPI Coaches' National Championship award.[2] Auburn had played the toughest schedule in the nation, including nine bowl teams, eight of which were ranked in the top 20 (four in the top ten), and two teams Auburn faced would compete against each other in the 1983 Florida Citrus Bowl (Tennessee won the game against Maryland 30-23). Also, Auburn beat Florida by a touchdown 28-21, the same Florida team that defeated Miami in the beginning of the season by a 28-3 score. The Tigers did finish ranked first in a few polls including the computer rankings utilized by The New York Times.[2]
Posted by Tigerman97
Member since Jun 2014
10354 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 9:32 pm to
quote:

In 1983 Texas beat AU like a drum in what was the biggest game ever played in Auburn up to that time. Texas was more deserving than Auburn.



There has never been a team more robbed of a national title than Auburn in 1983. I won't rehash the stats that prove it. Zero chance with Auburn's record that a blue blood isn't voted champion in 1983 with Auburn's record, schedule and the opponents having the same record. Your comment was rendered ignorant by stating Texas was more deserving despite loosing to uga in the bowl game when Auburn had beaten uga a few weeks earlier. I know we have a different system today but zero chance in 2017 Auburn isn't voted champion under the same system as 1983 with the same results because Auburn has a slightly higher profile today than in 1983.

Auburn beats USC in 2004 because they were by far the best team in the country that season. More talent. Tougher schedule. Better at every key position but linebacker and that was a push.
Posted by RandySavage
Member since May 2012
30917 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 10:53 pm to
quote:

In 1983 Texas beat AU like a drum in what was the biggest game ever played in Auburn up to that time. Texas was more deserving than Auburn.


I guess you're going to give that 2011 title back to LSU?
Posted by Ross
Member since Oct 2007
47824 posts
Posted on 6/23/17 at 10:32 am to
quote:

In 1983 Texas beat AU like a drum in what was the biggest game ever played in Auburn up to that time. Texas was more deserving than Auburn.



Troll on.

Want to actually stack up the resumes of Nebraska, Miami, Auburn, and Texas from 1983?

You'll realize quickly that Auburn played the strongest schedule and had the best wins of the group. They also lost to Texas in the second game of the season. Texas dropped the very last game of the season with the national title on the line.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter