Started By
Message

re: Let's say the Leo Lewis stuff is thrown out by the NCAA

Posted on 6/22/17 at 2:09 pm to
Posted by pankReb
Defending National Champs Fan
Member since Mar 2009
64753 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 2:09 pm to
quote:

It's just tough to prove the things he's alleged are wrong.


It's easy to prove that they don't use security tags.
It's easy to prove that they didn't have an employee by the name of Emily.
It's easy to prove that no gift cards were used on the dates and for the amounts specified by Leo Lewis during his testimony.


quote:

which the only ones who think it isn't are connected to Ole Miss



Well obviously that's because the people that can disprove Leo's claim are connected to Ole MIss.
Posted by AshLSU
Member since Nov 2015
12868 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 2:36 pm to
quote:

It's easy to prove that they don't use security tags. It's easy to prove that they didn't have an employee by the name of Emily. It's easy to prove that no gift cards were used on the dates and for the amounts specified by Leo Lewis during his testimony.


All are considered insignificant facts that will be totally ignored by any judge. Witness testimony almost always has little factoids like this that are incorrect or inconsistent. The point is, RR can not prove that this was done for slanderous purposes even if LL was lying about all of it.

RR will lose this case.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter