Started By
Message
re: Let's say the Leo Lewis stuff is thrown out by the NCAA
Posted on 6/22/17 at 2:09 pm to bamasgot13
Posted on 6/22/17 at 2:09 pm to bamasgot13
quote:
It's just tough to prove the things he's alleged are wrong.
It's easy to prove that they don't use security tags.
It's easy to prove that they didn't have an employee by the name of Emily.
It's easy to prove that no gift cards were used on the dates and for the amounts specified by Leo Lewis during his testimony.
quote:
which the only ones who think it isn't are connected to Ole Miss
Well obviously that's because the people that can disprove Leo's claim are connected to Ole MIss.
Posted on 6/22/17 at 2:36 pm to pankReb
quote:
It's easy to prove that they don't use security tags. It's easy to prove that they didn't have an employee by the name of Emily. It's easy to prove that no gift cards were used on the dates and for the amounts specified by Leo Lewis during his testimony.
All are considered insignificant facts that will be totally ignored by any judge. Witness testimony almost always has little factoids like this that are incorrect or inconsistent. The point is, RR can not prove that this was done for slanderous purposes even if LL was lying about all of it.
RR will lose this case.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News