Started By
Message

re: This stupid Ole Miss / Rebel rags lawsuit

Posted on 6/15/17 at 9:59 am to
Posted by tigerinridgeland
Mississippi
Member since Aug 2006
7638 posts
Posted on 6/15/17 at 9:59 am to
While negligence would be the standard ordinarily in a case not involving a public figure, it really isn't an option in this case due to the nature of the allegations. If, for example, Lewis said RR gave him free material, that is either a true statement, or knowingly false. Not much room for negligence, not has it been pleaded as a negligence case.

It really won't matter if the statements are written or oral. If it a signed affidavit, it would be libel. If it was oral testimony that was transcribed, it is most likely slander. In either case, no actual or special damages would be required, since it la a libel or slander per se case for the plaintiff's point of view.

Privilege won't apply since the statements were not part of a judicial proceeding and other privileges are qualified. Intentional false statements are not privileged in a qualified privilege situation
Posted by bamasgot13
Birmingham
Member since Feb 2010
13619 posts
Posted on 6/15/17 at 10:06 am to
quote:

It really won't matter if the statements are written or oral. If it a signed affidavit, it would be libel. If it was oral testimony that was transcribed, it is most likely slander. In either case, no actual or special damages would be required, since it la a libel or slander per se case for the plaintiff's point of view.


Then why didn't they file it this way? Seems reasonable to me, but they filed differently and have made it harder on themselves. Something about their filing is odd. I doubt they ever expect it to go to trial.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter