re: This stupid Ole Miss / Rebel rags lawsuit

quote:

---

Publication of false statements (libel) requires proof of malice. In this case, the plaintiff has to prove A) intent to harm, B) actual harm, and (this one is the biggie) C) that all the statements were false.

---

So he's lost his case right from the start. Their is no way he can prove that the 3 guys had "intent to harm" him or his business directly. Did they have intent to harm Ole Miss? Absolutely, but there was no "intent to harm" this one individual who owns this business.