Started By
Message

re: Missouri football has been more relevant than LSU since expansion.

Posted on 5/10/17 at 10:38 pm to
Posted by Tuscaloosa
11x Award Winning SECRant user
Member since Dec 2011
46797 posts
Posted on 5/10/17 at 10:38 pm to
quote:

Interesting definition!


2-0 is much more impressive than 42-13.

Division championships give a lot more relevance than a single meaningless game. It's clear which program is in better shape overall.

How has a program such as LSU fallen below Missouri? Very odd.
Posted by America1776
USA
Member since Jul 2010
1537 posts
Posted on 5/10/17 at 10:40 pm to
So you'd say LSU was more relevant to the SEC than Bana in 2011?

They won the division... who cares about that "single meaningless game" (your words, not mine)
Posted by AshLSU
Member since Nov 2015
12868 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 11:43 am to
fail thread by a fat frick
Posted by TigerBait2008
Boulder,CO
Member since Jun 2008
32561 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 7:00 pm to
Another troll thread by a troll...

All LSU all the time
Posted by I-H8-BAMA
Benton, Louisiana
Member since Jan 2013
10427 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 7:08 pm to
quote:

It's clear which program is in better shape overall. 

How has a program such as LSU fallen below Missouri? Very odd.


C'mon now
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter