Started By
Message
re: Missouri football has been more relevant than LSU since expansion.
Posted on 5/10/17 at 10:31 pm to America1776
Posted on 5/10/17 at 10:31 pm to America1776
quote:
Define relevant...
Challenging for a conference championship at a minimum.
3
Posted on 5/10/17 at 10:33 pm to Tuscaloosa
Interesting definition!
Do you consider 42-13 challenging?
Do you consider 42-13 challenging?
Posted on 5/10/17 at 11:05 pm to Tuscaloosa
Pretty sure mizzou finished below LSU every year not to mention the destruction in red stick
Posted on 5/12/17 at 10:14 am to Tuscaloosa
quote:
Challenging for a conference championship at a minimum.
Well the year they played LSU they didn't. So maybe they just have had an easier route. And it shows because they didn't challenge for shite in the actual seccg. Play LSU those years, would have been an auto loss.
Is LSU the only school to not have lost to an expansion team? I think so, the rest of the sec needs to get their shite together.
This post was edited on 5/12/17 at 10:17 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News