EL OH EL at the deflections in this thread and at anyone pretending Bama's 2008 season was in any way similar to Auburn's 2016 season and subsequent participation trophies.

Bama won the West in 2008, went undefeated in the regular season, and finished 12-2, with the only two losses coming against the teams that finished #1 & #2 in the final poll. You'll notice on the side of those gay arse Sugar Bowl rings of Bama's one of the sides says "SEC West Champions."

3 ...

Report Post

Posted by StopRobot

Mobile, AL

Member since May 2013

15412 posts

Posted on 4/24/17 at 10:06 am to Tuscaloosa

Giving rings for anything other than winning the conference or the national championship is utterly ridiculous. It deludes the reward of getting a ring

5 ...

Report Post

Posted by MrAUTigers

Florida

Member since Sep 2013

28302 posts

Posted on 4/24/17 at 10:09 am to Tuscaloosa

If you look at the ring, it clearly says "Sugar Bowl" on it. You lost to Utah. It was a "participation" ring. Absolutely no difference in Auburn's/bama's Sugar Bowl ring.

This post was edited on 4/24/17 at 10:10 am

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by NYCAuburn

TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff

Member since Feb 2011

57002 posts

Posted on 4/24/17 at 10:29 am to Tuscaloosa

quote:
EL OH EL at the deflections

quote:
Bama won the West in 2008, went undefeated in the regular season, and finished 12-2, with the only two losses coming against the teams that finished #1 & #2 in the final poll. You'll notice on the side of those gay arse Sugar Bowl rings of Bama's one of the sides says "SEC West Champions."