Started By
Message

re: The Final Four Nobody Wanted

Posted on 3/28/17 at 1:29 pm to
Posted by 1801
Charleston
Member since Aug 2012
6335 posts
Posted on 3/28/17 at 1:29 pm to
here ya go Miss Danny - available in tater purple.




2016 CFP Final Rated Lower Than Duke-Wisconsin Basketball
This playoff did not have a meter-moving team. Alabama brought the SEC audience (who watch anyway). Oklahoma isn’t a draw. Michigan State and Clemson aren’t traditional football powers. It ended up with an Inter-Dixie Final. Not surprisingly, it rated much lower than Ohio State playing two cross-regional matchups last year.

2017 - Why The Clemson Vs. Alabama Title Game Did Not Get High Ratings
CFP Championship overnight ratings on ESPN:

2017: Clemson/Alabama: (15.3 combined)
2016: Alabama/Clemson: 15.8
2015. Ohio St/Oregon: 18.5

— Sports TV Ratings (@SportsTVRatings) January 10, 2017


Clemson Is Not a Traditional Football Brand: This isn’t a knock on Clemson. But, the school’s consistent national football success is a recent phenomenon, basically the last few seasons. It does not have the accrued pull of schools that have been on television playing big games for 40-50 years. One-half or one-third the size of some of the bigger football powers, Clemson does not have the huge national alumni base of an Ohio State. Many people outside the South would not even know where Clemson is located.


------------------------------------

remember...."don't shoot the messenger ~ Miss Danny"
This post was edited on 3/28/17 at 1:33 pm
Posted by IStillMissDanny
S TX
Member since Aug 2016
2151 posts
Posted on 3/28/17 at 1:36 pm to
quote:

2017 - Why The Clemson Vs. Alabama Title Game Did Not Get High Ratings


Should Clemson give the trophy back? Since no one watched it? Does it not count?

Y'all haven't won this thing yet.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter