Started By
Message
re: MSU hat thrower
Posted on 3/1/17 at 11:17 am to HottyToddy7
Posted on 3/1/17 at 11:17 am to HottyToddy7
quote:
What recruits were paid that were on the 2016 team? Don't worry, I'll wait.
Per your AD, Student Athletes C& D, as defined in Allegations #2 and #5 of your 2ND NOA.
quote:
no one believes you were clean with Lewis or Jones either
Here's the quandary: people familiar with the LL situation believe, and I don't blame them, that MSU must have paid him. After all, if he got paid by OM, then he surely didn't go to MSU for free. But, they don't apply the same logic to the OM signees:
If OM admittedly paid a RECRUIT, then surely they let their own players get a little taste. So we are to believe OM was guilty of Pay for Visit but not Pay for Play ?
2
Posted on 3/1/17 at 11:25 am to Vecchio Cane
quote:
So we are to believe OM was guilty of Pay for Visit but not Pay for Play ?
This is how big time college football works. Let the NCAA in your house for 54 months and see what turns up. Then when they have nothing they go to your rival's players and tell them they can't be touched and to give up everything they have. See what comes up then. It wouldn't be pretty anywhere.
I'm not saying we are clean. We deserve the penalties we get for getting caught. We got caught speeding but we were in the flow of traffic. Not in a Lambo flying down the left shoulder with the bird to everyone.
Posted on 3/1/17 at 11:29 am to Vecchio Cane
quote:
Per your AD, Student Athletes C& D, as defined in Allegations #2 and #5 of your 2ND NOA.
Transportation isn't pay for play.
The rebel rags thing is BS. And a hat and shirt isn't pay for pay even if it was true. Keep trying.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News