Started By
Message
re: state fans what did ole miss do that pissed u off
Posted on 2/24/17 at 8:40 am to CleverUserName
Posted on 2/24/17 at 8:40 am to CleverUserName
NCAA wouldn't have interviewed a player from another school and offered immunity if they didn't already have evidence of impropriety. They didn't just pick these players randomly, come on people.
And as far as Leo "snitching" goes, none of ya'll know what options were presented to him.
More than likely it was:
A) come clean now and stay eligible
B) don't come clean, we investigate, find out you took it, you're inelligible
And as far as Leo "snitching" goes, none of ya'll know what options were presented to him.
More than likely it was:
A) come clean now and stay eligible
B) don't come clean, we investigate, find out you took it, you're inelligible
1
Posted on 2/24/17 at 8:59 am to MNW
quote:
NCAA wouldn't have interviewed a player from another school and offered immunity if they didn't already have evidence of impropriety.
Here is the real question....where exactly did they get this "evidence of impropriety"? We already know what the NCAA is capable of (reference the Miami case). Would anyone be surprised if this evidence didn't come from Ole Miss?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News