Started By
Message
re: Leo Lewis Deal is Bad for the SEC
Posted on 2/23/17 at 1:32 pm to TomRollTideRitter
Posted on 2/23/17 at 1:32 pm to TomRollTideRitter
quote:
A player getting immunity to snitch on a rival school opens the door to a lot of problems. I could easily see a desperate coach getting a player on his team to make up a story about a rival to try to save his job. Let's not become the Southwest Conference here.
How does nobody on here know how the immunity deals work?
The NCAA investigates a school. They gather evidence that suggests a violation occurred. They interview people. They get lied to. THEN they offer immunity to a kid at another school, to determine whether or not they were lied to.
None of the violations are based solely on the testimony of these immunity cases. They are based on evidence and confirmed by the testimony. And it doesn't work asking kids of the school you are investigating because A) they'd be more likely to lie to you and B) if they offer immunity to the kid, they can't charge the school with their findings.
This post was edited on 2/23/17 at 1:34 pm
1
Posted on 2/23/17 at 1:45 pm to UAtide11
I know that, and I don't see how that changes anything. A school can easily get another school investigated, and now they can create evidence against that school also.
I can't think of another probation where the testimony of a player on a rival team was presented as the centerpiece of the case.
They probably have more evidence, and like I said in the OP Ole Miss is guilty. Right now though, the indictment is centered around the testimony of rival players
I can't think of another probation where the testimony of a player on a rival team was presented as the centerpiece of the case.
They probably have more evidence, and like I said in the OP Ole Miss is guilty. Right now though, the indictment is centered around the testimony of rival players
This post was edited on 2/23/17 at 1:48 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News